Comparing supervised machine learning algorithms for the prediction of partial arterial pressure of oxygen during craniotomy

Author:

Becker-Pennrich Andrea SORCID,Mandl Maximilian M,Rieder Clemens,Hoechter Dominik J,Dietz Konstantin,Geisler Benjamin PORCID,Boulesteix Anne-Laure,Tomasi Roland,Hinske Ludwig C

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of continuous paO2 prediction in an intraoperative setting among neurosurgical patients with modern machine learning methods.Materials and MethodsData were extracted from routine clinical care of lung-healthy, neurosurgical patients. We used recursive feature elimination to identify relevant features for the prediction of paO2. Five machine learning algorithms (gradient boosting regressor, k-nearest neighbors regressor, random forest regressor, support vector regression, multi-layer perceptron regressor) and a multivariate linear regression were then tuned and fitted to the selected features. A performance matrix consisting of Spearman’s ρ, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) was finally computed based on the test set and used to compare and rank each algorithm.ResultsWe analyzed 4,180 patients with 12,497 observations. A total of 20 features were selected from analysis of the training dataset comprising 836 patients with 9,992 observations. The best algorithm, random forest, was able to predict paO2 values with ρ=0.90, MAPE=10.4%, and RMSE=30.9mmHg, closely followed by gradient boosting and multi-layer perceptron. Support vector regression, k-nearest neighbors regressor and the linear regression did not achieve the performance metrics.DiscussionWe successfully applied and compared several machine learning algorithms to estimate continuous paO2 values in neurosurgical patients. The random forest regressor performed best over all three categories of the performance matrix.ConclusionPaO2 can be predicted by perioperative routine data in neurosurgical patients.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3