High-fidelity Musculoskeletal Modeling Reveals a Motor Planning Contribution to the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff

Abstract

AbstractThe speed-accuracy tradeoff is a fundamental aspect of goal-directed motor behavior, empirically formalized by Fitts’ law, which relates movement duration to movement distance and target width. Here, we introduce a computational model of three-dimensional upper extremity movements that reproduces well-known features of reaching movements and is more biomechanically realistic than previous models. Critically, these features arise without the need of signal-dependent noise. We analyzed motor cortical neural activity from monkeys reaching to targets of different sizes. We found that the contribution of preparatory neural states to movement duration variability was greater for smaller targets than larger targets, and that movements to smaller targets exhibited less variability in preparatory neural states, but greater movement duration variability. Taken together, these results suggest that Fitts’ law emerges from greater task demands constraining the optimization landscape in a fashion that reduces the number of “good” control solutions (i.e., faster reaches). Thus, the speed-accuracy tradeoff could be a consequence of motor planning variability and optimal control theory, and not exclusively signal-dependent noise, as is currently held.Significance StatementA long-standing challenge in motor neuroscience is to understand the relationship between movement speed and accuracy, known as the speed-accuracy tradeoff. We introduce a computational model of reaching movements based on optimal control theory using a realistic model of musculoskeletal dynamics. The model synthesizes three-dimensional point-to-point reaching movements that reproduce kinematics features reported in motor control studies. Such high-fidelity modeling reveals that the speed-accuracy tradeoff as described by Fitts’ law emerges even without the presence of motor noise, which is commonly believed to underlie the speed-accuracy tradeoff. This suggests an alternative theory based on suboptimal control solutions. The crux of this theory is that some features of human movement are attributable to planning variability rather than execution noise.