Prevalence of missing data in the National Cancer Database and association with overall survival

Author:

Yang Daniel X.,Khera Rohan,Miccio Joseph A.,Jairam Vikram,Chang Enoch,Yu James B.,Park Henry S.,Krumholz Harlan M.ORCID,Aneja Sanjay

Abstract

AbstractImportanceCancer registries are important real-world data (RWD) sources that rely on data abstraction from the medical record, however, patients with unknown or missing data are under-represented in studies that use such data sources.ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of missing data and its associated overall survival among cancer patientsDesign, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this retrospective cohort study, all variables within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were reviewed for missing or unknown values for the three most common cancers in the United States diagnosed from 2006 to 2015. Prevalence of patient records with missing data and their associated overall survival were determined. Data analysis was performed from February to August 2020.ExposuresAny missing data field within a patient record among 63 variables of interest, from over 130 variables total in the NCDB.Main Outcome and MeasurePrevalence of cancer patient records with missing data and associated two-year overall survivalResultsA total of 1,198,749 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (mean [SD] age, 68.5 [10.9] years; 569,938 [47.5%] women), 2,120,775 breast cancer patients (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [13.3] years; 2,101,758 [99.1%] women), and 1,158,635 prostate cancer patients (mean [SD] age, 65.2 [9.0] years; 0 [0%] women) were included for analysis. For NSCLC, there were 851,295 (71.0%) patients with missing data in variables of interest; 2-year overall survival was 33.2% for patients with missing data and 51.6% for patients with complete data (p<0.001). For breast cancer, there were 1,161,096 (54.7%) patients with missing data; 2-year overall survival was 93.2% for patients with missing data and 93.9% for patients with complete data (p<0.001). For prostate cancer, there were 460,167 (39.7%) patients with missing data; 2-year overall survival was 91.0% for patients with missing data and 95.6% for patients with complete data (p<0.001).Conclusions and RelevanceWithin a large cancer registry-based RWD source, missing data that was unable to be ascertained from the medical record was highly prevalent. Missing data among cancer patients was associated with heterogeneous differences in overall survival. Improving documentation and data quality are needed to best leverage RWD for clinical advancements.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference53 articles.

1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Real-World Evidence. https://www.fda.gov/science-research/science-and-research-special-topics/real-world-evidence. Accessed 10/1/2020.

2. Real-world data: towards achieving the achievable in cancer care

3. The contribution of cancer surveillance toward real world evidence in oncology;Semin Radiat Oncol,2019

4. NCI and ASCO CancerLinQ collaboration to advance quality of cancer care and surveillance;Journal of Clinical Oncology,2019

5. Finding the evidence in real-world evidence: moving from data to information to knowledge;J Am Coll Surg,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3