Abstract
AbstractOperant chambers are small enclosures used to test animal behavior and cognition. While traditionally reliant on simple technologies for presenting stimuli (e.g., lights and sounds) and recording responses made to basic manipulanda (e.g., levers and buttons), an increasing number of researchers are beginning to use Touchscreen-equipped Operant Chambers (TOCs). These TOCs have obvious advantages, namely by allowing researchers to present a near infinite number of stimuli as well as increased flexibility in the types of responses that can be made and recorded. Here, we trained wild-caught adult and juvenile great-tailed grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) to complete experiments using a TOC. We have learned much from these efforts, and outline the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches. We report data from our training sessions and discuss important modifications we made to facilitate animal engagement and participation in various tasks. Finally, we provide a “training guide” for creating experiments using PsychoPy, a free and open-source software that we have found to be incredibly useful during these endeavors. This article, therefore, should serve as a useful resource to those interested in switching to or maintaining a TOC, or who similarly wish to use a TOC to test the cognitive abilities of non-model species or wild-caught individuals.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference44 articles.
1. Aplin, L. (2018). Wild vs. Lab Box 4.2 Bringing Avian Cognition to the Wild. Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal Cognition: A Comparative Guide, 92.
2. Integration of spatial maps in pigeons
3. Blaisdell A. P. , Johnson-Ulrich Z , Bergeron L , Rowney C , Seitz B , McCune K , Folsom M , MacPherson M , Logan CJ . 2019. Do the more flexible individuals rely more on causal cognition? Observation versus intervention in causal inference in great-tailed grackles. (http://corinalogan.com/Preregistrations/g_causal.html) In principle acceptance by PCI Ecology of the version on 31 Jan 2019 https://github.com/corinalogan/grackles/blob/master/Files/Preregistrations/g_causal.Rmd
4. Bridges, D. , Pitiot, A. , MacAskill, M. R. , & Peirce, J. W. (2020, Pre-print). The timing mega-study: comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d6nu5
5. The touchscreen cognitive testing method for rodents: How to get the best out of your rat