FAIRshake: toolkit to evaluate the findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of research digital resources

Author:

Clarke Daniel J. B.ORCID,Wang Lily,Jones Alex,Wojciechowicz Megan L.ORCID,Torre Denis,Jagodnik Kathleen M.ORCID,Jenkins Sherry L.ORCID,McQuilton PeterORCID,Flamholz Zachary,Silverstein Moshe C.,Schilder Brian M.ORCID,Robasky KimberlyORCID,Castillo Claris,Idaszak Ray,Ahalt Stanley C.,Williams JasonORCID,Schurer StephanORCID,Cooper Daniel J.ORCID,de Miranda Azevedo RicardoORCID,Klenk Juergen A.ORCID,Haendel Melissa A.,Nedzel JaredORCID,Avillach Paul,Shimoyama Mary E.ORCID,Harris Rayna M.,Gamble Meredith,Poten Rudy,Charbonneau Amanda L.,Larkin JennieORCID,Brown C. TitusORCID,Bonazzi Vivien R.ORCID,Dumontier Michel J.ORCID,Sansone Susanna-AssuntaORCID,Ma’ayan AviORCID

Abstract

AbstractAs more datasets, tools, workflows, APIs, and other digital resources are produced by the research community, it is becoming increasingly difficult to harmonize and organize these efforts for maximal synergistic integrated utilization. The Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) guiding principles have prompted many stakeholders to consider strategies for tackling this challenge by making these digital resources follow common standards and best practices so that they can become more integrated and organized. Faced with the question of how to make digital resources more FAIR, it has become imperative to measure what it means to be FAIR. The diversity of resources, communities, and stakeholders have different goals and use cases and this makes assessment of FAIRness particularly challenging. To begin resolving this challenge, the FAIRshake toolkit was developed to enable the establishment of community-driven FAIR metrics and rubrics paired with manual, semi- and fully-automated FAIR assessment capabilities. The FAIRshake toolkit contains a database that lists registered digital resources, with their associated metrics, rubrics, and assessments. The FAIRshake toolkit also has a browser extension and a bookmarklet that enables viewing and submitting assessments from any website. The FAIR assessment results are visualized as an insignia that can be viewed on the FAIRshake website, or embedded within hosting websites. Using FAIRshake, a variety of bioinformatics tools, datasets listed on dbGaP, APIs registered in SmartAPI, workflows in Dockstore, and other biomedical digital resources were manually and automatically assessed for FAIRness. In each case, the assessments revealed room for improvement, which prompted enhancements that significantly upgraded FAIRness scores of several digital resources.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference18 articles.

1. Wilkinson, M.D. , Dumontier, M. , Aalbersberg, I.J. , Appleton, G. , Axton, M. , Baak, A. , Blomberg, N. , Boiten, J.-W. , da Silva Santos, L.B. and Bourne, P.E. (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3.

2. Lassila, O. and Swick, R.R. (1998) Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification.

3. FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies;Nature biotechnology,2019

4. Cox, S. and Yu, J. (2017) OzNome 5-star Tool: A Rating System for making data FAIR and Trustable. eResearch Australasia 2017.

5. Dillo, I. and De Leeuw, L. (2014) Data Seal of Approval: Certification for sustainable and trusted data repositories. The Hague: Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), 2014, 20.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3