Continuous Evaluation of Denoising Strategies in Resting-State fMRI Connectivity Using fMRIPrep and Nilearn

Author:

Wang Hao-TingORCID,Meisler Steven LORCID,Sharmarke Hanad,Clarke Natasha,Gensollen NicolasORCID,Markiewicz Christopher JORCID,Paugam François,Thirion BertrandORCID,Bellec PierreORCID

Abstract

AbstractReducing contributions from non-neuronal sources is a crucial step in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) connectivity analyses. Many viable strategies for denoising fMRI are used in the literature, and practitioners rely on denoising benchmarks for guidance in the selection of an appropriate choice for their study. However, fMRI denoising software is an ever-evolving field, and the benchmarks can quickly become obsolete as the techniques or implementations change. In this work, we present a denoising benchmark featuring a range of denoising strategies, datasets and evaluation metrics for connectivity analyses, based on the popular fMRIprep software. The benchmark is implemented in a fully reproducible framework, where the provided research objects enable readers to reproduce or modify core computations, as well as the figures of the article using the Jupyter Book project and the Neurolibre reproducible preprint server (https://neurolibre.org/). We demonstrate how such a reproducible benchmark can be used for continuous evaluation of research software, by comparing two versions of the fMRIprep software package. The majority of benchmark results were consistent with prior literature. Scrubbing, a technique which excludes time points with excessive motion, combined with global signal regression, is generally effective at noise removal. Scrubbing however disrupts the continuous sampling of brain images and is incompatible with some statistical analyses, e.g. auto-regressive modeling. In this case, a simple strategy using motion parameters, average activity in select brain compartments, and global signal regression should be preferred. Importantly, we found that certain denoising strategies behave inconsistently across datasets and/or versions of fMRIPrep, or had a different behavior than in previously published benchmarks. This work will hopefully provide useful guidelines for the fMRIprep users community, and highlight the importance of continuous evaluation of research methods. Our reproducible benchmark infrastructure will facilitate such continuous evaluation in the future, and may also be applied broadly to different tools or even research fields.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference53 articles.

1. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn;Frontiers in Neuroinformatics,2014

2. Adebimpe, A. , Bertolero, M. , Mehta, K. , Salo, T. , Murtha, K. , Cieslak, M. , Meisler, S. , Madison, T. , Sydnor, V. , Covitz, S. , Fair, D. , & Satterthwaite, T . (2023). XCP-D : A Robust Postprocessing Pipeline of fMRI data. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7641626

3. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI

4. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

5. Bilder, R. , Poldrack, R. , Cannon, T. , London, E. , Freimer, N. , Congdon, E. , Karlsgodt, K. , & Sabb, F. (2020). UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics LA5c Study [Data set]. Openneuro. https://doi.org/10.18112/OPENNEURO.DS000030.V1.0.0

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3