Sensorimotor Confidence for Tracking Eye Movements

Abstract

AbstractFor successful interactions with the world, we often have to evaluate our own performance. Such metacognitive evaluations have been studied with perceptual decisions, but much less with respect to the evaluation of our own actions. While eye movements are one of the most frequent actions we perform, we are typically unaware of them. Here, we investigated if there is any evidence for metacognitive sensitivity for the accuracy of eye movements. Participants tracked a dot cloud as it followed an unpredictable sinusoidal trajectory for six seconds, and then reported if they thought their performance was better or worse than their average tracking performance. Our results show above chance identification of better tracking behavior across all trials and also for repeated attempts of the same target trajectories. While the sensitivity in discriminating performance between better and worse trials was stable across sessions, for their judgements participants relied more on performance in the final seconds of each trial. This behavior matched previous reports when judging the quality of hand movements, although overall metacognitive sensitivity for eye movements was significantly lower. Together, these results provide an additional piece of evidence for sensorimotor confidence, and open interesting questions about why it differs across actions and how it could be related to other instances of confidence.Statement of RelevanceIn everyday life, it is often critical to be able to evaluate the quality of our own cognitive decisions and actions. However, one of our most frequent actions often does not even reach our awareness: eye movements. We investigated whether observers were able to successfully judge the accuracy of their eye movements when tracking a cloud of dots that followed an unpredictable trajectory. We found that observers were able to distinguish good from bad trials, although sensitivity was lower compared to equivalent previous reports when judging the quality of hand movements. These results add an item to the growing list of our metacognitive abilities, but critically for eye movements that we are typically unaware of. They lead to important novel questions about why metacognitive abilities differ across decisions or different types of actions, and what the potential components of metacognitive abilities might be.