Pararectus versus ilioinguinal approach for the management of acetabular fractures: A Protocol for Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Author:

Rajnish Rajesh KumarORCID,Srivastava Amit,Yadav Sandeep Kumar,Elhence Abhay,Rathor Kuldeep,Gupta Saurabh

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAcetabular fractures result from high-energy trauma, and their complex anatomy poses a challenge to surgeons for open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures. The goal of fixation is an anatomical reduction of articular surfaces and stable fixation with minimal damage to vital structures around. The long-term clinical outcomes of these fractures are significantly impacted by selecting an appropriate surgical approach with minimal complications to achieve an anatomical reduction with congruent articular surfaces. The purpose of this review is to compare the outcomes of the pararectus (PR) versus the ilioinguinal (IL) approach for the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced acetabular fractures by looking at the evidence in the existing literature.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A primary search will be done through the electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library using a pre-defined search strategy. A comparative study, either randomized control trials (RCTs) or non-randomized trials, which have compared at least one outcome of the internal fixation of acetabular fractures using the PR versus IL approach will be included in the current review.Single-armed non-comparative studies, conference posters, abstracts, case reports, review articles, cadaveric studies, book chapters, technical tips, and biomechanical studies will be excluded. Both qualitative and quantitative data analysis will be performed. Appropriate tables and diagrams will be used to demonstrate the qualitative data presentation, and wherever feasible, a quantitative analysis will be done with the appropriate software. The risk-of-bias assessment for non-randomized comparative studies will be done using the MINORS tool, and the Cochrane Collaborations risk-of-bias tool will be used for RCTs.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference11 articles.

1. Clinical Results of Acetabular Fracture via the Pararectus versus Ilioinguinal Approach;Orthop Surg,2021

2. Fixation of acetabular fractures via the ilioinguinal versus pararectus approach: a direct comparison;Bone Joint J,2015

3. Ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 717 patients across ten studies;Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2023

4. The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach;Clin Orthop Relat Res,1993

5. Fractures of the acetabulum. A study of a series of 75 cases. 1961;Clin Orthop Relat Res,1994

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3