A rapid review of what organisational level factors support or inhibit the scale and spread of innovations in children’s social care

Author:

Mann MalaORCID,Lifford KateORCID,O’Connell Susan,Weightman Alison,Searchfield Lydia,Lewis Ruth,Cooper Alison,Edwards Adrian

Abstract

AbstractInnovation may provide a means for tackling challenges facing childrens social care, some of them deep-rooted and many exacerbated by COVID-19. Welsh Government has recently committed to a significant 3-year investment to support innovation in adults and childrens social care. The delivery of social care in Wales has a complex and multi-faceted approach, involving collaborative working between a range of organisations, which will likely affect decisions around implementation and scale-up of new and/or existing interventions. The aim of the review was to identify any factors (barriers and enablers) that affect the implementation and scale up of an innovation in childrens social care organisations.Ten studies were identified, comprising three secondary studies (reviews) and seven primary studies. Factors potentially influencing scale and spread of innovation were extracted and categorised. The domains (and sub-domains) covered by included studies were; adopters (staff role/identity; carer input), organisation (capacity to innovate; readiness for change; nature of adoption/funding; extent of change needed; work needed to implement), and wider system (political/policy; regulatory/legal; professional; socio-cultural).Enablers for which a clear consensus seems to be emerging across the literature included: specific training and support for professional staff, support and mutual respect within inter-professional and professional-carer relationships, senior management/leadership buy-in and support, multi-disciplinary communication and joint working, and developing compatible data systems to support joint working/collaboration. Barriers for which a clear consensus seems to be emerging across the literature were: short term or lack of funding (the need for funding was presented as an enabler in some studies), and implementation difficulties (e.g. multiple priorities and changing structures).Policy Implications: This review highlights the complexity of the social care models but provides some clear pointers for policy and practice. The findings indicate the need for: senior management buy-in and support, short and longer term funding, multi-disciplinary communication and joint working, good professional (and professional-carer) relationships with support and mutual respect, and specific training and support for professional staff.The confidence in the evidence is uncertain as the study designs included non-systematic reviews and service evaluations; most studies did not use a formal methodology and all had some quality limitations.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference26 articles.

1. An innovative approach to delivering a family-based intervention to address parental alcohol misuse: Qualitative findings from a pilot project;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022

2. Callanan S , and Mitchell D. (2020). Scaling innovation in social care. Rapid pragmatic evidence review: summary report. Social Care Institute for Excellence. London, Great Britain. Available at: https://www.scie.org.uk/transformingcare/innovation/network/reports/scaling-innovation [Accessed 30 January 2023].

3. City and County of Swansea. (2014). Review of implementing Signs of Safety. Solution and safety orientation approach to child protection case work. “Our journey so far”. Swansea: City and County of Swansea, February 2014. https://docplayer.net/6113751-City-and-countyof-swansea-review-of-implementing-signs-of-safety-solution-and-safetyorientation-approach-to-child-protection-case-work.html [Accessed 03 March 2023].

4. Collyer A , Hennessey A , Sanders M , et al. (2021). Strengthening Families, Protecting Children: Family valued. Pilot Evaluation Report Darlington. London: What Works Centre for Children’s Social Care. Available at: [Accessed 03 March 2023].

5. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018). CASP (Qualitative) Checklist. Available at: file:///C:/Users/wlbmkm/Downloads/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form%20(1).pdf [Accessed 03 March 2023].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3