Abstract
AbstractMulti-omic analyses contribute to understanding complex biological processes, but also to making reliable predictions about, for example, disease outcomes. Several linear joint dimensionality reduction methods exist, but recently neural networks are more commonly used to embed different-omics into the same non-linear manifold. We compared linear to non-linear joint embedding methods using bulk and single-cell data. For modality imputation, non-linear methods had a clear advantage. Comparisons in downstream supervised tasks lead to the following insights: First, concatenating the principal components of each modality is a competitive baseline for multi-modal prediction. If only one modality was available at test time, joint embeddings yielded significant performance improvements with respect to a unimodal predictor. Second, imputed omics profiles can be fed to classifiers trained on real data with limited performance drops. Overall, the product-of-experts architecture performed well in most tasks while a common encoder of concatenated modalities performed poorly.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献