Comparison of different genotyping techniques to distinguish recrudescence from new infection in studies assessing the efficacy of antimalarial drugs againstPlasmodium falciparum

Author:

Schnoz Annina,Beuret Carla,Concu Maura,Hosch Salome,Rutaihwa Liliana K.,Golumbeanu MonicaORCID,Nsanzabana ChristianORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTDistinguishing recrudescence from new infections is crucial for the assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy againstPlasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum). Different genotyping methods are used and may impede the comparison of drug efficacy estimates in space and time, particularly in patients from high transmission settings with polyclonal infections.We compared five different genotyping methods currently used to assess their sensitivity in detecting minority clones in polyclonal infections, their robustness, and the genetic diversity of the markers used. Our study utilized four well-characterizedP. falciparumlaboratory strains mixed in varying ratios, and 20 paired patient samples collected from a clinical trial.We found that high-resolution capillary electrophoresis (H-CE) using length-polymorphic markers, as well as targeted amplicon deep sequencing (TADS) using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-rich markers, revealed the highest sensitivity in detecting minority clones, while also exhibiting robustness, and high genetic diversity in the used markers. Moreover, markers used by TADS gave more consistent results. We observed that microsatellites had a lower genetic diversity compared to markers such as msp1,msp2, glurpand SNP-rich markers, with some genotypes having allelic frequencies of > 30 %.The replacement ofglurpby microsatellites did not result in a change in the genotyping outcome, probably due to the lower genetic diversity of microsatellites used in comparison toglurp. More studies with large sample sizes are necessary to identify the most suitable microsatellites that could replaceglurpas per the latest recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) on genotyping to distinguish recrudescence from new infections in high transmission settings. Our study indicates that TADS should be considered the gold standard for genotyping to differentiate recrudescence from new infection and should be used to validate other techniques.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3