The Impact of Intensive Blood Pressure Management in the Post-Thrombolysis Setting: a real-world observational study

Author:

Harper Bethan,Ranta Syrah,McNaughton HarryORCID,Ranta AnnaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionSystolic Blood pressure (SBP) >180mmHg following stroke thrombolysis has been associated with increased bleeding and poorer outcome. Aiming for the guideline SBP of <180mmHg often leads to SBP overshoot as treatment is only triggered if this threshold is passed. We tested whether a lower target would result in fewer high SBP protocol violations.MethodsThis is a prospective, single centre, sequential comparison of two blood pressure protocols. Between 2013 and 2017, the guideline based post-thrombolysis SBP target of <180mmHg was compared with a new protocol aiming for 140-160mmHg. Primary outcome was rate of patients with SBPs >180 mmHg. Secondary outcomes included rate of SBP <120 mmHg, antihypertensive infusion use, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH), and 3-month functional independence (mRS 0-2). Results were adjusted for age, baseline function, and stroke severity using regression analysis.ResultsDuring the 23 months preceding and 18 months following the transition to the new protocol 68 and 100 patients were thrombolysed respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The odds of one or more SBPs >180mmHg trended lower in the intensive group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.61; 95% CI 0.32-1.17; p=0.14). There was a higher rate of SBPs <120mmHg (aOR 3.09; 95% CI 1.49-6.40; p=0.002) in the intensive BP protocol group. sICH rate and 3-month mRS 0-2 were similar between groups.ConclusionsThe more intensive post-thrombolysis BP protocol led to a significant increase in sub-optimally low BP events with a non-significant trend toward fewer high BP protocol violations and unaffected patient outcomes.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3