Author:
Roura-Pascual Núria,Leung Brian,Rabitsch Wolfgang,Rutting Lucas,Vervoort Joost,Bacher Sven,Dullinger Stefan,Erb Karl-Heinz,Jeschke Jonathan M.,Katsanevakis Stelios,Kühn Ingolf,Lenzner Bernd,Liebhold Andrew M.,Obersteiner Michael,Pauchard Anibal,Peterson Garry D.,Roy Helen E.,Seebens Hanno,Winter Marten,Burgman Mark A.,Genovesi Piero,Hulme Philip E.,Keller Reuben P.,Latombe Guillaume,McGeoch Melodie A.,Ruiz Gregory M.,Scalera Riccardo,Springborn Michael R.,von Holle Betsy,Essl Franz
Abstract
AbstractScenario analysis has emerged as a key tool to analyze complex and uncertain future socio-ecological developments. However, current global scenarios (narratives of how the world may develop) have neglected biological invasions, a major threat to biodiversity and the economy. We used a novel participatory process to develop a diverse set of global biological invasion scenarios spanning a wide breadth of plausible global futures through 2050. We adapted the widely used “two axes” scenario analysis approach to develop four families of four scenarios each, resulting in 16 scenarios that were later clustered into four contrasting sets of futures. Our analysis highlighted that socio-economic developments and changes in sustainability policies and lifestyle have the potential to shape biological invasions, in addition to well-known ecological drivers, such as climate and human land use change. Our scenarios align fairly well with the recently developed shared socio-economic pathways, but the factors that drive differences in biological invasions are underrepresented there. Including these factors in global scenarios and models is essential to adequately consider biological invasions in global environmental assessments, and obtain a more integrative picture of future socio-ecological developments.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference52 articles.
1. Alexandratos N , Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. ESA Working paper No. 12-03. FAO, Rome
2. The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality
3. Carpenter SR , Pingali PL , Bennett EM , Zurek MB (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios. Findings of the Scenarios Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
4. CBD (2010) Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi targets, Conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environment Programme, Nagoya
5. CCAFS (2014) Exploring the future(s) of South East Asia: Four scenarios for agriculture and food security, livelihoods and environments. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Copenhagen