Clinical impact of the Predict Prostate risk communication tool in men newly diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Author:

Thurtle David,Jenkins Val,Freeman Alex,Pearson Mike,Recchia Gabriel,Tamer Priya,Leonard Kelly,Pharoah Paul,Aning Jonathan,Madaan Sanjeev,Goh Chee,Hilman Serena,McCracken Stuart,Ilie Petre Cristian,Lazarowicz Henry,Gnanapragasam Vincent

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionPredict Prostate is a freely-available online personalised risk communication tool for men newly diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer. Its accuracy has been assessed in multiple validation studies but the clinical impact of the tool on patient decision-making had not previously been evaluated.MethodsA multi-centre randomised controlled trial was performed across 8 UK centres, wherein newly diagnosed men considering either active surveillance or radical treatment, were randomised to either standard of care (SOC) information or SOC and presentation of Predict Prostate. Validated questionnaires were completed assessing impact of the tool on decisional conflict, uncertainty, anxiety and understanding of survival.Results156 patients were included; mean age 67 years (range 44-80) and PSA of 6.9ng/ml (range 0.5-59.8). 81 were randomised to the Predict Prostate arm, and 75 to SOC information only. Mean decisional conflict scores were 26% lower in the Predict Prostate group (mean = 15.9) than in the SOC group (mean = 21.5) (p=0.01). Scores on the ‘effective decision’, ‘uncertainty’ and ‘value clarity’ subscales all indicated that the Predict Prostate group felt more informed and clear about their decision (all p<0.05). There was no significant difference in anxiety between the two groups.Patient perceptions of 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival benefit from radical treatment were considerably lower among men in the Predict Prostate group (p<0.0001). 58% of men reported the Predict Prostate estimates for PCSM were lower than expected, and 35% reported being less likely to select radical treatment. Over 90% of patients in the Predict Prostate group found it useful and 94% would recommend it to others.ConclusionPredict Prostate reduces decisional conflict and uncertainty in non-metastatic prostate cancer and shifts patient perceptions around prognosis to be more realistic. This is the first randomised study of such a tool in this context; it demonstrates Predict Prostate can directly inform the complex decision-making process in prostate cancer.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference28 articles.

1. Audit NPC. National Prostate Cancer Audit Annual Report 2019. https://www.npca.org.uk/reports/npca-annual-report-2019/.

2. Treatment Decision Regret Among Long-Term Survivors of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study;Journal of Clinical Oncology,2017

3. Risk stratification for prostate cancer management: value of the Cambridge Prognostic Group classification for assessing treatment allocation;BMC Med,2020

4. NICE. Endorsed resource - Predict Prostate. Prostate Cancer: diagnosis and management. May 2019.

5. Individual prognosis at diagnosis in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: Development and external validation of the PREDICT Prostate multivariable model;PLoS Med,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3