Review and performance evaluation of trait-based between-community dissimilarity measures

Author:

Lengyel AttilaORCID,Botta-Dukát ZoltánORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the recent years a variety of indices have been proposed with the aim of quantifying functional dissimilarity between communities. These indices follow different approaches to account for between-species similarities in the calculation of community dissimilarity, yet they all have been proposed as straightforward tools.In this paper we reviewed the trait-based dissimilarity indices available in the literature, contrasted the approaches they follow, and evaluated their performance in terms of correlation with an underlying environmental gradient using individual-based community simulations with different gradient lengths. We tested how strongly dissimilarities calculated by different indices correlate with environmental distances. Using random forest models we tested the importance of gradient length, the choice of data type (abundance vs. presence/absence), the transformation of between-species similarities (linear vs. exponential), and the dissimilarity index in the predicting correlation value.We found that many indices behave very similarly and reach high correlation with environmental distances. There were only a few indices (e.g. Rao’s DQ, and representatives of the nearest neighbour approach) which performed regularly poorer than the others. By far the strongest determinant of correlation with environmental distance was the gradient length, followed by the data type. The dissimilarity index and the transformation method seemed not crucial decisions when correlation with an underlying gradient is to be maximized.Synthesis: We provide a framework of functional dissimilarity indices and discuss the approaches they follow. Although, these indices are formulated in different ways and follow different approaches, most of them perform similarly well. At the same time, sample properties (e.g. gradient length) determine the correlation between trait-based dissimilarity and environmental distance more fundamentally.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3