Cancer risk and sexual conflict as constraints to body size evolution

Abstract

AbstractSelection often favours large bodies, visible as Cope’s rule over macroevolutionary time — but size increases are not inevitable. One understudied cost of large bodies is the high number of cell divisions and the associated risk of oncogenic mutations. Our elasticity analysis shows that selection against a proportional increase in size becomes ever more intense with increasing body size if cancer is the sole selective agent. Thus cancer potentially halts body size increases even if no other constraint does so. We then provide multicellular realism with potentially sexually dimorphic body sizes and traits that control cell populations from zygote to maturity and beyond (ontogenetic management). This shows sexual conflict to extend to ontogeny; sexual dimorphism in mortalities and other life history measures may evolve even in the absence of any ecological causes underlying size- or sex-dependent mortality. Coadaptation of ontogenetic management and body size is required for substantial increases in size.