Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundAlthough atrial electrograms (EGMs) are thought to reflect pathophysiological substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF), it is not known which electrograms are suitable targets during AF ablation. We hypothesized that electrogram morphology recurrence (EMR) better reflects arrhythmogenic AF substrate than traditional frequency and complexity measures of AF. In a canine rapid atrial pacing (RAP) model of AF, we assessed the relationship between EMR and traditional AF electrogram measures, rotational activity in the atria, fibrosis, myofiber orientation and parasympathetic innervation.MethodsPersistent AF was induced in 13 dogs by RAP for 6-8 weeks. High-density epicardial mapping (117 electrodes) was performed in six atrial sub-regions. EMR measures Recurrence percentage (Rec%) and cycle length of the most frequent electrogram morphology (CLR), Fractionated Interval (FI), Organization Index (OI), Dominant Frequency (DF) and Shannon’s Entropy (ShEn) were analyzed before and after atropine administration. Myocyte fiber orientation, amount of fibrosis and spatial distribution of parasympathetic nerve fibers were quantified.ResultsRec% was greatest in the appendages, and CLR was lowest in the posterior left atrium. Rec%/CLR correlated with FI, OI and the complexity measure ShEn, but not with DF. All electrogram measures were poorly correlated with fibrosis and myofiber anisotropy. Rec% correlated closely with stability of rotational activity. Unlike other measures, Rec% correlated closely with spatial heterogeneity of parasympathetic nerve fibers; this was reflected in CLR response to atropine.ConclusionEMR correlates closely with stability of rotational activity and with the pattern of atrial parasympathetic innervation. CLR may therefore be a viable therapeutic target in persistent AF.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory