The evolution of anisogamy does not always lead to male competition

Abstract

Anisogamy has evolved in a large proportion of sexually reproducing multicellular organisms allowing the definition of the female and male sexes, producing large and small gametes, respectively. Anisogamy is the initial sexual dimorphism: it has lead the sexes to experience selection differently, which makes it a good starting point to understand the evolution of further sexual dimorphisms. For instance, it is generally accepted that anisogamy sets the stage for more intense intrasexual competition in the male sex than in the female sex. However, we argue that this idea may rely on assumptions on the conditions under which anisogamy has evolved in the first place. We consider here two widely accepted scenarios for the evolution of anisogamy: gamete competition or gamete limitation. We present a mechanistic mathematical model in which both gamete size and an intrasexual competition trait for fertilisation can coevolve in a population starting without dimorphism between its two mating types. Two different intrasexual competition traits are investigated, gamete motility and the ability of gametes to capture gametes of the opposite mating type. We show that gamete competition and gamete limitation can lead to greatly different outcomes in terms of which sex competes most for fertilisation. Our results suggest that gamete competition is most likely to lead to stronger competition in males. On the other hand, under gamete limitation, competition in form of motility can evolve in either sex while gamete capture mainly evolves in females. This study suggests that anisogamy does not per se lead to more intense male competition. The conditions under which anisogamy evolves matter, as well as the competition trait considered.