Comparison of everting sutures and the lateral tarsal strip with or without everting sutures for involutional lower eyelid entropion: A meta-analysis

Author:

Hwang Gyudeok,Kim Hyo Sin,Lee Jiyoung,Paik Ji-Sun

Abstract

AbstractThere are three pathophysiologies of involutional entropion, vertical laxity (VL), horizontal laxity (HL), and overriding of the preseptal orbicularis. The effects of methods to correct VL only, HL only, or both VL and HL in patients with involutional entropion were compared using the published results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).To find RCT studies that investigated methods to correct involutional entropion, a systematic search was performed from database inception to April 2020 in the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Two independent researchers conducted the literature selection and data extraction. Evaluation of the quality of the reports was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias (ROB 2.0). The data analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines using Review Manager 5.3.Two RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. Surgery for involutional entropion was performed on a total of 109 eyes. Everting sutures (ES) were used on 57 eyes and lateral tarsal strips (LTS) or combined procedures (LTS + ES) were performed on 52 eyes. At the end of the follow-up periods, involutional entropion recurred in 18 eyes (31.6%) in the ES group and three eyes (5.8%) in the LTS +/- ES group. Analysis of the risk ratio showed that the LTS +/- ES method significantly lowered the recurrence rate compared to using ES only (P = 0.007).Performing LTS +/- ES effectively lowered the recurrence rate of involutional entropion compared to ES alone. However, some patients cannot tolerate more invasive corrections such as LTS. Therefore, sequential procedures, in which ES is performed first and then when entropion recurs LTS +/- ES is performed, or another methods depending upon the degree of HL may be used.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3