Nitrate fertilization may delay autumn leaf senescence, while amino acid treatments do not

Abstract

AbstractFertilization with nitrogen (N)-rich compounds leads to increased growth, but may compromise phenology and winter survival of trees in boreal regions. During autumn, N is remobilized from senescing leaves and stored in other parts of the tree to be used in the next growing season. However, the mechanism behind the N fertilization effect on winter survival is not well understood and it is unclear how N levels or forms modulate autumn senescence. We performed fertilization experiments and showed that treating Populus saplings with high or low levels of inorganic nitrogen resulted in a delay in senescence. In addition, by using precise delivery of solutes into the xylem stream of Populus trees in their natural environment, we found that delay of autumn senescence was dependent on the form of N administered: inorganic N (NO3−1) delayed senescence but amino acids (Arg, Glu, Gln, and Leu) did not. Metabolite profiling of leaves showed that the levels of tricarboxylic acids (TCA), arginine catabolites (ammonium, ornithine), glycine, glycine-serine ratio and overall carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio were affected differently by the way of applying NO3−1 and Arg treatments. In addition, the onset of senescence did not coincide with soluble sugar accumulation in any of the treatments. Taken together, metabolomic rearrangement under different N forms or experimental setups could modulate senescence process, but not initiation and progression in Populus. We propose that the different regulation of C and N status through direct molecular signaling of NO3−1 could account for the contrasting effects of NO3−1 and Arg on senescence.One sentence summaryNitrate, administered by precision fertilization through injection into the trunk, may delay autumn senescence and change metabolism in Populus leaves, while the same amount of amino acids does not have the same effect.