The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study

Author:

Barbazza EricaORCID,Ivanković DamirORCID,Davtyan KarapetORCID,Poldrugovac MirchaORCID,Yelgezekova ZhaminORCID,Willmington ClaireORCID,Meza-Torres BernardoORCID,Bos Véronique L.L.C.ORCID,Fernandes Óscar BritoORCID,Rotar AlexandruORCID,Nuti SabinaORCID,Vainieri MilenaORCID,Carinci FabrizioORCID,Azzopardi-Muscat NatashaORCID,Groene OliverORCID,Novillo-Ortiz DavidORCID,Klazinga NiekORCID,Kringos DionneORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundGovernments across the WHO European Region prioritized dashboards for reporting COVID-19 data. The ubiquitous use of dashboards for public reporting is novel. This study explores the development of COVID-19 dashboards during the pandemic’s first year and common barriers, enablers and lessons from the experiences of teams responsible for their development.MethodsMultiple methods were applied to identify and recruit COVID-19 dashboard teams using a purposive, quota sampling approach. Semi-structured group interviews were conducted between April– June 2021. Using elaborative coding and thematic analysis, descriptive and explanatory themes were derived from interview data. A validation workshop with study participants was held in June 2021.ResultsEighty informants, representing 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams across the WHO European Region participated. Most dashboards were launched swiftly in the first months of the pandemic, between February–May 2020. The urgency, intense workload, limited human resources, data and privacy constraints, and public scrutiny were common to the initial development stage. Themes related to barriers or enablers were identified pertaining to the pre-pandemic context, pandemic itself, people and processes, software, data, and users. Lessons emerged around the themes of simplicity, trust, partnership, software and data, and change.ConclusionsCOVID-19 dashboards were developed in a learning-by-doing approach. The experiences of teams signal initial under-preparedness was compensated by high-level political endorsement, the professionalism of teams, accelerated data improvements, and immediate support of commercial software solutions. To leverage the full potential of dashboards, investments are needed at team-, national- and pan-European-level.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference74 articles.

1. World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance. 2000, World Health Organization Geneva

2. A review of health governance: Definitions, dimensions and tools to govern

3. Travis, P. , et al., Towards better stewardship: concepts and critical issues. 2002, World Health Organization: Geneva.

4. European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis

5. World Health Organization , Global surveillance during an influenza pandemic. 2009, World Health Organization: Geneva.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3