Abstract
ABSTRACTObjectivesThis study was conducted to explore the perspectives and opinions of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses and doctors at a COVID-19 designated pandemic hospital concerning the preparedness and response to COVID-19 and to consolidate the lessons learnt for crisis/disaster management in the future.DesignA qualitative study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). Purposeful sampling was conducted to identify participants. A semi-structured guide was utilised to facilitate in-depth interviews with individual participants. Two focus group discussions were conducted, one with the ICU doctors and another with the ICU nurses. Thematic analysis identified themes and subthemes informing about the level of preparedness, response measures, processes, and factors that were either facilitators or those that triggered challenges.SettingICU in a quaternary referral centre affiliated to a university teaching COVID-19 designated pandemic hospital, in Adelaide, South Australia.ParticipantsThe participants included eight ICU doctors and eight ICU nurses for the in-depth interviews. Another sixteen clinicians participated in focus group discussions.ResultsThe study identified six themes relevant to preparedness for, and responses to, COVID-19. The themes included: (1) Staff competence and planning, (2) Information transfer and communication, (3) Education and skills for the safe use of PPE, (4) Team dynamics and clinical practice, (5) leadership, and (6) Managing End-of life situations and expectations of caregivers.ConclusionFindings highlight that preparedness and response to the COVID-19 crisis were proportionate to the situation’s gravity. More enablers than barriers were identified. However, opportunities for improvement were recognised in the domains of planning, logistics, self-sufficiency with equipment, operational and strategic oversight, communication, and managing end-of-life care.ARTICLE SUMMARYStrengths and limitations of this studyThis is the first study that provided insights about clinicians’ perspectives and viewpoints to preparing and responding to COVID-19 in Australia.The study used qualitative methodological framework allowing participants to provide in-depth accounts of processes and enabling factors and barriers.Our study provides information on issues that needs to be addressed from a critical care viewpoint and interventions that were effective and efficientThis is a single-center study in a developed country where experience is vastly different from other centers with higher demand and fewer resourcesWe acknowledge the potential for selection bias because of the qualitative design
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference45 articles.
1. Outcomes for patients with COVID-19 admitted to Australian intensive care units during the first four months of the pandemic;Med J Aust,2021
2. Surge capacity of intensive care units in case of acute increase in demand caused by
COVID
‐19 in Australia
3. Cook TM , El-Boghdadly K , McGuire B , McNarry AF , Patel A , Higgs A. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, and the Royal College of Anesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2020 Mar 27.
4. ANZICS guiding principles for complex decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic;Crit Care Resusc,2020
5. Australian Government Department of Health [internet]. Guidance on the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in hospitals during the COVID-19 outbreak. Version 6 [cited 2020 Jun 19]. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/guidanceon-the-use-of-personal-protectiveequipment-ppe-in-hospitals-duringthe-covid-19-outbreak
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献