Two distinct modes of hemodynamic responses in the human brain

Author:

Epp Samira M.ORCID,Castrillón GabrielORCID,Yuan Beija,Andrews-Hanna JessicaORCID,Preibisch ChristineORCID,Riedl ValentinORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) detects changes in brain activity by measuring fluctuations in blood oxygenation. While fMRI assumes a fixed relationship between changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolic activity, its uniform application across the human cortex lacks complete validation. We used quantitative fMRI together with blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI to assess oxygen metabolism against both positive and negative BOLD signal changes. We found a surprising mismatch between changes in oxygen consumption and the direction of BOLD signal changes (ΔBOLD) in 14-33% of voxels with significant positive, and in 50-66% of voxels with significant negative ΔBOLD. This implies that a substantial number of voxels with negative ΔBOLD actually demonstrate increased metabolic activity, and vice versa. Contrary to the canonical hemodynamic response model, discordant voxels cover their oxygen demand predominantly via changes in the oxygen extraction fraction (ΔOEF) and not via ΔCBF. This coincides with a higher vascular density and a lower OEF during baseline that we identified in discordant voxels. In summary, we identified a second type of hemodynamic response mechanism for regulating oxygen supply in the human brain. Our results suggest that the classical interpretation of positive and negative BOLD signal changes in terms of increased or decreased neural activity may be too simplistic and we recommend incorporating quantitative MRI or additional CBF measurements for a more accurate assessment of neuronal activity.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3