Performance of ICD-10-based injury severity scores in pediatric trauma patients using the ICD-AIS map and survival rate ratios

Author:

Hojeij RayanORCID,Brensing PiaORCID,Nonnemacher MichaelORCID,Kowall BerndORCID,Felderhoff-Müser UrsulaORCID,Dudda MarcelORCID,Dohna-Schwake ChristianORCID,Stang AndreasORCID,Bruns NoraORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveOur study aimed to identify the superior predictor of mortality from International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) codes among pediatric trauma patients in the German hospital database (GHD), a nationwide database comprising all hospitalizations in the country.Study design and settingHospital admissions of patients aged < 18 years with injury-related ICD-10 codes were selected. The maximum abbreviated injury scale (MAIS) and injury severity score (ISS) were calculated using the ICD-AIS map provided by the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, which we adjusted to the German modification of the ICD-10 classification. The survival risk ratio was used to calculate the single worst ICD-derived injury (single ICISS) and a multiplicative injury severity score (multiplicative ICISS). The ability to predict mortality of the four above mentioned scores were compared in the selected trauma population and within four clinically relevant subgroups using discrimination and calibration.ResultsOut of 13,992,596 cases < 18 years of age hospitalized between 2014 and 2020, 1,720,802 were trauma patients and ICD-AIS mapping was possible in 1,328,377 cases. Mortality was highest in patients with only one coded injury. Cases with mapping failure (n = 392,425; 22.8 %) were younger and had a higher mortality rate. SRR-derived scores had a better discrimination calibration than ICD-AIS based scores in the overall cohort and all four subgroups (AUC ranges between 0.985 and 0.998 versus 0.886 and 0.972 respectively).ConclusionEmpirically derived measures of injury severity were superior to ICD-AIS mapped scores in the GHD to predict mortality in pediatric trauma patients. Given the high percentage of mapping failure and high mortality among cases with single coded injury, the single ICISS may be the most suitable measure of injury severity in this group of patients.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3