Using Digital Tools in Clinical, Health and Social Care Research: A Mixed-Methods Study of UK Stakeholders

Author:

Clohessy SophieORCID,Arvanitis Theodoros N.ORCID,Rashid Umer,Craddock Carly,Evans Mark,Toro CarlaORCID,Elliott Mark T.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated changes to clinical research methodology, with clinical studies being carried out via online/remote means. This mixed-methods study aimed to identify which digital tools are currently used across all stages of clinical research by stakeholders in clinical, health and social care research and investigate their experience using digital tools.DesignTwo online surveys followed by semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.Setting, ParticipantsTo explore the digital tools used since the pandemic, survey participants [Researchers and Related Staff (n=41), Research and Development staff (n=25)], needed to have worked on clinical, health or social care research studies over the past two years (2020-2022) in an employing organisation based in the West Midlands region of England (due to funding from a regional clinical research network). Survey participants had the opportunity to participate in an online qualitative interview to explore their experiences of digital tools in greater depth (n=8).ResultsSix themes were identified in the qualitative interviews: ‘Definition of a Digital Tool in Clinical Research’;‘Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic’;‘Perceived Benefits/Drawbacks of Digital Tools’;‘Selection of a Digital Tool’; ‘Barriers and Overcoming Barriers’;and‘Future Digital Tool Use’.The context of each theme is discussed, based on the interview results.ConclusionsFindings demonstrate how digital tools are becoming embedded in clinical research, as well as the breadth of tools used across different research stages. The majority of participants viewed the tools positively, noting their ability to enhance research efficiency. Several considerations were highlighted; concerns about digital exclusion; need for collaboration with digital expertise/clinical staff, research on tool effectiveness and recommendations to aid future tool selection. There is a need for the development of resources to help optimise the selection and use of appropriate digital tools for clinical research staff and participants.Article SummaryStrengths and Limitations of the StudyMixed-method study to explore experiences of utilising digital tools in clinical research, utilising participants from a variety of roles; both Research and Research and Development staff.Survey and qualitative questions co-designed with an experienced stakeholder group.It is likely that participants were motivated to participate due to an underlying interest in digital tools, consequently some perspectives may not have been included in this study.The study was limited to exploring the views of stakeholders employed by organisations based in the West Midlands, United Kingdom.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3