The impact of speaker accent on discourse processing: a frequency investigation

Abstract

AbstractPrevious studies show that there are differences in native and foreign speech processing (Lev-Ari, 2018) while mixed evidence has been found regarding differences between dialectal and foreign accent processing (see: Adank et al., 2009; Floccia et al. 2006 but see also: Floccia et al., 2009; Girard et al., 2008). Within this field, two theories have been proposed. The Perceptual Distance Hypothesis states that the mechanisms underlying dialectal accent processing are attenuated versions of those of foreign (Clarke & Garrett, 2004). While, the Different Processes Hypothesis argues that the mechanisms of foreign and dialectal accent processing are qualitatively different (Floccia et al, 2009). A recent study looking at single-word EEG data, suggested that there may be flexibility in processing mechanisms (Thomas et al., 2022). The present study deepens this investigation by addressing in which frequency bands native, dialectal and foreign accent processing differ when listening to extended speech. Electroencephalographic data was recorded from 30 participants who listened to dialogues of approximately six minutes spoken in native, dialectal and foreign accents. Power spectral density estimation (1-35 hz) was performed. Linear mixed models were done in frequency windows of particular relevance to discourse processing. Frequency bands associated with phoneme [gamma], syllable [theta], and prosody [delta] were considered along with those of general cognitive mechanisms [alpha and beta]. Results show power differences in the Gamma frequency range. While in higher frequency ranges foreign accent processing is differentiated from power amplitudes of native and dialectal accent processing, in low frequencies we do not see any accent-related power amplitude modulations. This suggests that there may be a difference in phoneme processing for native accent types and foreign accent, while we speculate that top-down mechanisms during discourse processing may mitigate the effects observed with short units of speech.