Diagnostic Accuracy of the Abbot BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card Test, Puerto Rico

Author:

Madewell Zachary J.ORCID,Major Chelsea G.,Graff Nathan,Adams Cameron,Rodriguez Dania M.,Morales Tatiana,Medina Lopes Nicole A.,Tosado Rafael,Sánchez-González Liliana,Perez-Padilla Janice,Volkman Hannah R.,Bertran Jorge,Sainz Diego,Munoz-Jordan Jorge,Santiago Gilberto A.,Lorenzi Olga,Rivera-Amill Vanessa,Rolfes Melissa A.ORCID,Paz-Bailey Gabriela,Adams Laura E.,Wong Joshua M.ORCID,

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. In August 2020, the Abbot BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card test became available as a timely and affordable alternative for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, but its performance may vary due to factors including timing and symptomatology. This study evaluates BinaxNOW diagnostic performance in diverse epidemiological contexts.MethodsUsing RT-PCR as reference, we assessed performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in anterior nasal swabs from participants of two studies in Puerto Rico from December 2020 to May 2023. Test performance was assessed by days post symptom onset, collection strategy, vaccination status, symptomatology, repeated testing, and RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values.ResultsBinaxNOW demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 98.8%. Sensitivity peaked within 1–6 days after symptom onset (93.2%) and was higher for symptomatic (86.3%) than asymptomatic (67.3%) participants. Sensitivity declined over the course of infection, dropping from 96.3% in the initial test to 48.4% in testing performed 7–14 days later. BinaxNOW showed 99.5% sensitivity in participants with low Ct values (≤25) but lower sensitivity (18.2%) for participants with higher Cts (36–40).ConclusionsBinaxNOW demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage infections and symptomatic participants. In situations where test sensitivity is crucial for clinical decision- making, nucleic acid amplification tests are preferred. These findings highlight the importance of considering clinical and epidemiological context when interpreting test results and emphasize the need for ongoing research to adapt testing strategies to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference52 articles.

1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. October 12, 2023. Accessed October 12, 2023. https://covid19.who.int/

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Isolation and Precautions for People with COVID-19. October 3, 2023. Accessed October 3, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/isolation.html

3. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

4. Clinical Features of COVID-19, Dengue, and Influenza among Adults Presenting to Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Clinics—Puerto Rico, 2012–2021

5. Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 Pneumonia

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3