AI learns racial information from the values of vital signs

Author:

Velichkovska Bojana,Gjoreski Hristijan,Denkovski Daniel,Kalendar Marija,Mullan Irene Dankwa,Gichoya Judy Wawira,Martinez Nicole,Celi Leo Anthony,Osmani Venet

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBias in medical practice is multifaceted, including treatment variations across race-ethnicity, unconscious bias in healthcare providers’ attitudes, and bias in clinical scores. However, far less is known about the potential racial bias in routinely collected, essential information in clinical decision-making, namely vital signs.Research questionDo vital signs embed racial information that can be learned by AI algorithms?Study Design and MethodsRetrospective cohort study of critically ill patients between 2014 and 2015 from the multi-centre eICU-CRD critical care database involving 335 Intensive Care Units (ICU) based in 208 US hospitals, containing 200,859 patient admissions. We extracted 10,763 critical care admissions of patients aged 18 and over, alive during the first 24 hours after admission to ICU with recorded self-reported race as well as at least two measurement of heart rate, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and blood pressure. Pairs of racial subgroups were matched based on age, gender, admission diagnosis and APACHE IV scores. Traditional machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost and Logistic regression were used to predict self-reported race using values of vital signs as an input.ResultsAI models derived from only six vital signs can predict patients’ self-reported race with an AUC of 0.74 (± 0.022) between White and Black patients. Technologies used to measure oxygen saturation are a significant source of self-reported racial information (AUC of 0.72 ± 0.028), in addition to blood pressure measurements (AUC of 0.63 ± 0.035). Care delivery practices do not present a significant source of racial information (AUC of 0.57 ± 0.019). However, even when controlling for these known factors, self-reported race can still be learned from vital signs, whose origin we cannot currently explain.InterpretationVital signs embed racial information that can be learned by AI algorithms, posing a significant risk to equitable clinical decision-making. Mitigating measures might be challenging, considering fundamental role of vital signs.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3