Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among GPT-4 based ChatGPT, GPT-4V based ChatGPT, and radiologists in musculoskeletal radiology

Author:

Horiuchi DaisukeORCID,Tatekawa HiroyukiORCID,Oura TatsushiORCID,Shimono TaroORCID,Walston Shannon LORCID,Takita HirotakaORCID,Matsushita ShuORCID,Mitsuyama YasuhitoORCID,Miki YukioORCID,Ueda DaijuORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-4 based ChatGPT, GPT-4 with vision (GPT-4V) based ChatGPT, and radiologists in musculoskeletal radiology.Materials and MethodsWe included 106 “Test Yourself” cases fromSkeletal Radiologybetween January 2014 and September 2023. We input the medical history and imaging findings into GPT-4 based ChatGPT and the medical history and images into GPT-4V based ChatGPT, then both generated a diagnosis for each case. Two radiologists (a radiology resident and a board-certified radiologist) independently provided diagnoses for all cases. The diagnostic accuracy rates were determined based on the published ground truth. Chi-square tests were performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4 based ChatGPT, GPT-4V based ChatGPT, and radiologists.ResultsGPT-4 based ChatGPT significantly outperformed GPT-4V based ChatGPT (p< 0.001) with accuracy rates of 43% (46/106) and 8% (9/106), respectively. The radiology resident and the board-certified radiologist achieved accuracy rates of 41% (43/106) and 53% (56/106). The diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4 based ChatGPT was comparable to that of the radiology resident but was lower than that of the board-certified radiologist, although the differences were not significant (p= 0.78 and 0.22, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4V based ChatGPT was significantly lower than those of both radiologists (p< 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionGPT-4 based ChatGPT demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than GPT-4V based ChatGPT. While GPT-4 based ChatGPT’s diagnostic performance was comparable to radiology residents, it did not reach the performance level of board-certified radiologists in musculoskeletal radiology.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference32 articles.

1. OpenAI. GPT-4 technical report. arXiv [cs.CL]. 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

2. Brown TB , Mann B , Ryder N , et al. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv [cs.CL]. 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165

3. Bubeck S , Chandrasekaran V , Eldan R , et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv [cs.CL]. 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712

4. Eloundou T , Manning S , Mishkin P , et al. GPTs are GPTs: an early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. arXiv [econ.GN]. 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130

5. OpenAI. GPT-4V(ision) system card. [Internet] 2023 Sep 25 [cited 2023 October 13]; Available from: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4v-system-card.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3