Patient and family engagement interventions on patients’ safety in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Pang YanORCID,Szücs Anna,Cabello Ignacio Ricci,Gangannagaripalli Jaheeda,Goh Lay Hoon,Leong Foon Leng,Zhou Li Fan,Valderas Jose M.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEngaging patients and their families has been proposed and promoted as key strategy in patient safety. However, little is known about the translation of such an approach in primary care. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the effectiveness of interventions promoting patient and family engagement for patient safety in primary care based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsFive electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to February 2023 with key words structured in four blocks (patient and family engagement; patient safety; primary care; randomised controlled trial). Two independent study team members screened each record. For studies reporting on similar safety outcomes, results were combined into meta-analyses. Risk of bias and level of certainty were accessed. Reporting followed PRISMA standards.ResultsSixteen records were identified, among which eight completed RCTs. Interventions covered “Inform about Engagement” and “Empower” levels regarding patient/family engagement but did not reach the highest level of “Partner/Integrate.” The interventions primarily targeted medication safety outcomes, with meta-analyses on adverse drug events and medication appropriateness (assessed categorically and continuously) showing no significant effects (Log OR=-0.32, 95%CI [-0.78, 0.14], OR=0.72, 95%CI [-0.32,0.16]; Log OR=-0.08, 95%CI [-0.32, 0.16], OR=0.92, 95%CI [0.73,1.17]; MD=0.56, 95%CI [-0.61, 1.72]). Overall risk of bias was low and the certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to high for most completed studies, except for adverse drug events, where certainty was rated low.ConclusionRCTs investigating interventions related to patient and family engagement in primary care patient safety are limited and yield inconclusive results. Patient engagement strategies should delve into more comprehensive levels of patient and family engagement and address diverse patient safety outcomes.What is already known on this topicInvolving patients and their families in patient safety has been advocated and emphasized as a crucial strategy. However, current reviews have yet to incorporate evidence evaluating the effectiveness of various intervention types and their impact on safety outcomes in the primary care setting.What this study addsThis review provides a synthesis of available RCTs examining the effects of interventions on patient and family engagement and their impact on patient safety within the primary care context.How this study might affect research, practice or policyThe findings from the review indicate that interventions targeting patient and family engagement did not exhibit a discernible impact on patient safety outcomes in the primary care setting. This underscores the imperative for more rigorous evaluations within this domain.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference68 articles.

1. WHO. Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030 [online]. 2021. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/policy/global-patient-safety-action-plan (accessed 01 December 2023).

2. Patient safety in primary and outpatient health care;Journal of family medicine and primary care,2020

3. Patient safety in primary health care: a systematic review;Cadernos de saúde pública,2014

4. Smith M , Saunders R , Stuckhardt L , McGinnis JM. Engaging patients, families, and communities. Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America: National Academies Press (US); 2013.

5. Perspectives on patient and family engagement with reduction in harm: the forgotten voice;Journal of nursing care quality,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3