Author:
Soto Juan L.P.,Jerbi Karim
Abstract
AbstractFor the assessment of functional interactions between distinct brain regions there is a great variety of mathematical techniques, with well-known properties, relative merits and shortcomings; however, the methods that deal specifically with task-based fluctuations in interareal coupling are scarce, and their relative performance is unclear. In the present article, we compare two approaches used in the estimation of correlation changes between the envelope amplitudes of narrowband brain activity obtained from magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. One approach is an implementation of semipartial canonical correlation analysis (SP-CCA), which is formally equivalent to the psychophysiological interactions technique successfully applied to functional magnetic resonance data. The other approach, which has been used in recent electrophysiology studies, consists of simply computing linear correlation coefficients of signals from two experimental conditions and taking their differences. We compared the two approaches with simulations and with multi-subject MEG signals acquired during a visuomotor coordination study. The analyses with simulated activity showed that computing differences in correlation coefficients (DCC) provided better discrimination between true coupling changes and spurious effects; on the other hand, SP-CCA resulted in significant effects around the reference location which were not found with DCC, and which may be due to field spread. Based on our findings, we recommend the use of DCC for the detection of task-based changes in connectivity, as it provided better performance than SP-CCA.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory