Abstract
AbstractThe industrialization of farming has had an enormous impact. To most, this impact is viewed solely in the context of productivity, but the denser living conditions and shorter rearing periods of industrial livestock farms provide pathogens with an ideal opportunity to spread and evolve. For example, the industrialization of poultry farms drove the Marek’s disease virus (MDV) to evolve from causing a mild paralytic syndrome to causing a highly contagious, globally prevalent, disease that can have up to a 100% mortality rate. Fortunately, the economic catastrophe that would occur from MDV evolution has been prevented through widespread use of live imperfect vaccines that limit disease symptoms, but fail to prevent transmission. Unfortunately, the continued rollout of such imperfect vaccines is steering the evolution of MDV towards an even greater virulence and an ability to evade vaccine protection. Thus, there is a need to investigate alternative economically viable control measures for their ability to inhibit MDV spread and evolution. In what follows we examine the economic viability of standard husbandry practices for their ability to inhibit the spread of both virulent MDV and very virulent MDV throughout an industrialized egg farm. To do this, we parameterized a dynamic MDV transmission model and calculate the loss in egg production due to disease. We find that the MDV strain as well as the cohort duration had the greatest influence on disease burden and hence egg production. Additionally, we find that the standard husbandry practice involving conventional cages, often referred to as “battery cages”, results in the least per capita loss in egg production due to MDV infection when compared to alternative enriched or aviary (free-run) systems for virulent MDV, but not very virulent MDV, in which case the Aviary system performs the best. These results highlight an important cost that managers will face when implementing new hen husbandry practices.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory