Inherent population structure determines the importance of filtering parameters for reduced representation sequencing analyses

Author:

Selechnik D.ORCID,Richardson M.F.ORCID,Hess M.K.,Hess A.S.,Dodds K.G.,Martin M.,Chan T.C.,Cardilini A.P.A.,Sherman C.D.H.,Shine R.,Rollins L.A.

Abstract

AbstractAs technological advancements enhance our ability to study population genetics, we must understand how the intrinsic properties of our datasets influence the decisions we make when designing experiments. Filtering parameter thresholds, such as call rate and minimum minor allele frequency (MAF), are known to affect inferences of population structure in reduced representation sequencing (RRS) studies. However, it is unclear to what extent the impacts of these parameter choices vary across datasets. Here, we reviewed literature on filtering choices and levels of genetic differentiation across RRS studies on wild populations to highlight the diverse approaches that have been used. Next, we hypothesized that choices in filtering thresholds would have the greatest impact when analyzing datasets with low levels of genetic differentiation between populations. To test this hypothesis, we produced seven simulated RRS datasets with varying levels of population structure, and analyzed them using four different combinations of call rate and MAF. We performed the same analysis on two empirical RRS datasets (low or high population structure). Our simulated and empirical results suggest that the effects of filtering choices indeed vary based on inherent levels of differentiation: specifically, choosing stringent filtering choices was important to detect distinct populations that were slightly differentiated, but not those that were highly differentiated. As a result, experimental design and analysis choices need to consider attributes of each specific dataset. Based on our literature review and analyses, we recommend testing a range of filtering parameter choices, and presenting all results with clear justification for ultimate filtering decisions used in downstream analyses.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3