Abstract
AbstractStress is a ubiquitous part of life that disrupts cellular function and, if unresolved, can irreparably damage essential biomolecules and organelles. All organisms can experience stress in the form of unfavorable environmental conditions including exposure to extreme temperatures, hypoxia, reactive oxygen species, alcohol, or shifts in osmolarity. To survive, organisms must sense these changes then react and adapt. One highly conserved adaptive response to stress is through protein sumoylation, which is a post-translational modification by the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) protein. In this study, we examine the effects of acute ethanol stress on protein sumoylation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although ethanol induces protein sumoylation, the targets and roles of sumoylation are largely unknown. Here, we found that cells exhibit a transient sumoylation response after exposure of cells to ≤ 7.5% volume/volume ethanol. The response peaks at 15 minutes and resolves by 60 minutes, indicating that cells have an adaptive response to low concentrations of ethanol. By contrast, the sumoylation response becomes chronic at 10% ethanol stress with no resolution by 60 minutes. To identify key targets of ethanol-induced sumoylation, we performed mass spectrometry analyses and identified 18 proteins with increased sumoylation after acute ethanol exposure, with 15 identified as known chromatin-associated proteins. Two of these proteins are the chromatin structural proteins Smc5 and Smc6, which are sumoylated by the activity of the SUMO ligase Mms21. Ethanol-induced Smc5/6 sumoylation occurs during G1 and G2M phases of the cell cycle but is abrogated during S phase despite the fact that other proteins are sumoylated during this phase. Acute ethanol exposure leads to formation of Rad52 foci indicating DNA damage similar to that observed with the addition of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), which is an alkylating agent that damages DNA. Whereas MMS exposure induces the intra-S phase DNA damage checkpoint as observed by Rad53 phosphorylation, ethanol exposure does not induce the intra-S phase checkpoint and prevents Rad53 phosphorylation when added with MMS. From these results, we propose that ethanol induces a structural change in chromatin, possibly through DNA damage, and this causes sumoylation of conserved chromatin-associated proteins, including Smc5 and Smc6.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory