Abstract
SummaryVisual landmarks influence spatial cognition [1–3], navigation [4,5] and goal-directed behavior [6–8], but their influence on visual coding in sensorimotor systems is poorly understood [6,9–11]. We hypothesized that visual responses in frontal cortex control gaze areas encode potential targets in an intermediate gaze-centered / landmark-centered reference frame that might depend on specific target-landmark configurations rather than a global mechanism. We tested this hypothesis by recording neural activity in the frontal eye fields (FEF) and supplementary eye fields (SEF) while head-unrestrained macaques engaged in a memory-delay gaze task. Visual response fields (the area of visual space where targets modulate activity) were tested for each neuron in the presence of a background landmark placed at one of four oblique configurations relative to the target stimulus. 102 of 312 FEF and 43 of 256 SEF neurons showed spatially tuned response fields in this task. We then fit these data against a mathematical continuum between a gaze-centered model and a landmark-centered model. When we pooled data across the entire dataset for each neuron, our response field fits did not deviate significantly from the gaze-centered model. However, when we fit response fields separately for each target-landmark configuration, the best fits shifted (mean 37% / 40%) toward landmark-centered coding in FEF / SEF respectively. This confirmed an intermediate gaze / landmark-centered mechanism dependent on local (configuration-dependent) interactions. Overall, these data show that external landmarks influence prefrontal visual responses, likely helping to stabilize gaze goals in the presence of variable eye and head orientations.HighlightsPrefrontal visual responses recorded in the presence of visual landmarksResponse fields showed intermediate gaze / landmark-centered organizationThis influence depended on specific target-landmark configurations
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference49 articles.
1. Wiener, J.M. , Kmecova, H. , and de Condappa, O. (2012). Route repetition and route retracing: Effects of cognitive aging. Front. Aging Neurosci. 4. Available at: /pmc/articles/PMC3356884/?report=abstract [Accessed September 11, 2020].
2. Finding the return path: Landmark position effects and the influence of perspective;Front. Psychol,2016
3. Independent working memory resources for egocentric and allocentric spatial information;PLOS Comput. Biol,2019
4. Quantifying the interactions between allo- and egocentric representations of space
5. Fischer, L.F. , Soto-Albors, R.M. , Buck, F. , and Harnett, M.T. (2020). Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex. Elife 9.