Factors Underlying Asymmetric Dynamics of Disaggregase and Microtubule Severing AAA+ Machines

Abstract

AbstractDisaggregation and microtubule-severing nanomachines from the AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily assemble into ring–shaped hexamers that enable protein remodeling by coupling large–scale conformational changes with application of mechanical forces within a central pore by loops protruding within the pore. We probed these motions and intra-ring interactions that support them by performing extensive explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations of single-ring severing proteins and the double-ring disaggregase ClpB. Simulations reveal that dynamic stability of hexamers of severing proteins and of the nucleotide binding domain 1 (NBD1) ring of ClpB, which belong to the same clade, involves a network of salt bridges that connect conserved motifs of central PL1 loops of the hexamer. Clustering analysis of ClpB highlights correlated motions of domains of neighboring protomers supporting strong inter-protomer collaboration. Severing proteins have weaker inter-protomer coupling and stronger intra-protomer stabilization through salt bridges formed between PL2 and PL3 loops. Distinct mechanisms are identified in the NBD2 ring of ClpB involving weaker inter–protomer coupling through salt bridges formed by non–canonical loops and stronger intra–protomer coupling. Pore width fluctuations associated with the PL1 constriction in the spiral states, in the presence of a substrate peptide, highlight stark differences between narrowing of channels of severing proteins and widening of the NBD1 ring of ClpB. This indicates divergent substrate processing mechanisms of remodeling and translocation by ClpB and substrate tail-end gripping and possible wedging on microtubule lattice by severing enzymes. Relaxation dynamics of the distance between the PL1 loops and the centers of mass of protomers reveals observation-time-dependent dynamics, leading to predicted relaxation times of tens of microseconds on millisecond experimental timescales. For ClpB the predicted relaxation time is in excellent agreement with the extracted time from smFRET experiments.