Biological variation estimates of Alzheimer’s disease plasma biomarkers in healthy individuals

Author:

Brum Wagner S.,Ashton Nicholas J.,Simrén JoelORCID,di Molfetta Guiglielmo,Karikari Thomas K.ORCID,Benedet Andrea L.,Zimmer Eduardo R.,Lantero-Rodriguez JuanORCID,Montoliu-Gaya Laia,Jeromin Andreas,Aarsand Aasne K.,Bartlett William A.,Calle Pilar Fernández,Coşkun Abdurrahman,Díaz–Garzón Jorge,Jonker Niels,Zetterberg Henrik,Sandberg Sverre,Carobene Anna,Blennow Kaj

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionBlood biomarkers have proven useful in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but little is known about their biological variation (BV), which plays a crucial role in the interpretation of individual patient data.MethodsWe measured plasma amyloid-β (Aβ42, Aβ40), phosphorylated tau (p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in fasting plasma samples collected weekly over 10 weeks from 20 participants aged 40-60y from the European Biological Variation Study. We determined within- (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV, analytical variation (CVA) and reference change values (RCV).ResultsBiomarkers presented considerable variability in CVIand CVG. Aβ42/Aβ40 had the lowest CVI(∼3%) and p-tau181 the highest (∼16%), while the others ranged from 6-10%. Most RCVs ranged from 20-30% (decrease) and 25-40% (increase).InterpretationWe provide BV estimates for AD plasma biomarkers, which can potentially refine their clinical and research interpretation. RCVs might be useful for detecting significant changes between serial measurements when monitoring early disease progression or interventions.Highlights·Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 presents the lowest between- and within-subject biological variation, but also changes the least in AD patients vs controls.·Plasma p-tau variants significantly vary in their within-subject biological variation, but their substantial fold-changes in AD likely limits the impact of their variability.·Plasma NfL and GFAP demonstrate high between-subject variation, the impact of which will depend on clinical context.·Reference change values can potentially be useful in monitoring early disease progression and the safety/efficacy of interventions on an individual-level.·Serial sampling revealed that unexpectedly high values in heathy invidivuals can be observed, which urges caution when interpreting AD plasma biomarkers based on a single test result.Research in ContextSystematic ReviewWe reviewed PubMed for articles and conference abstracts that evaluated the biological variation (BV) of novel Alzheimer’s disease (AD) blood biomarkers. Two previous studies had reported BV estimates for serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL). Thus, we aimed to provide the first robust BV estimates for plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) biomarkers, and also for plasma GFAP and NfL in in the same population.InterpretationPlasma biomarkers of key pathological features of AD demonstrate heterogeneity in their within- and between-subject variation. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 generally shows lower variability but also changes very modestly in AD patients vs controls. While plasma p-tau variants demonstrate higher variability, its clinical impact is likely limited due to large fold-increases in AD. Plasma NfL and GFAP had the largest between-subject variability, which may impact upon their application in certain contexts. Most research on blood biomarkers so far has been done using either single measurements or repeated measurements over longer (e.g., yearly) time frames; the weekly serial sampling in our study revealed that unexpected outlier values may occur, urging caution in clinical and research interpretation.Future directionsFuture studies should evaluate the potential clinical impact of the application of BV knowledge upon clinical and research interpretation of AD plasma biomarkers, especially in disease monitoring and in the evaluation of safety and efficacy of novel therapeutic interventions.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3