Methods for evaluating unsupervised vector representations of genomic regions

Author:

Zheng GuangtaoORCID,Rymuza JuliaORCID,Gharavi ErfanehORCID,LeRoy Nathan J.ORCID,Zhang AidongORCID,Sheffield Nathan C.ORCID

Abstract

BackgroundRepresentation learning models have become a mainstay of modern genomics. These models are trained to yield vector representations, or embeddings, of various biological entities, such as cells, genes, individuals, or genomic regions. Recent applications of unsupervised embedding approaches have been shown to learn relationships among genomic regions that define functional elements in a genome. Unsupervised representation learning of genomic regions is free of the supervision from curated metadata and can condense rich biological knowledge from publicly available data to region embeddings. However, there exists no method for evaluating the quality of these embeddings in the absence of metadata, making it difficult to assess the reliability of analyses based on the embeddings, and to tune model training to yield optimal results.MethodsTo bridge this gap, we propose four evaluation metrics: the cluster tendency test (CTT), the reconstruction test (RCT), the genome distance scaling test (GDST), and the neighborhood preserving test (NPT). The CTT and RCT are statistical methods that evaluate how well region embeddings can be clustered and how much the embeddings can preserve the information contained in training data. The GDST and NPT exploit the biological tendency of regions close in genomic space to have similar biological functions; they measure how much such information is captured by individual region embeddings and a set of region embeddings.ResultsWe demonstrate the utility of these statistical and biological tests for evaluating unsupervised genomic region embeddings and provide guidelines for learning reliable embeddings.AvailabilityCode is available athttps://github.com/databio/geniml.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3