Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThis Phase IV prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the safety and monitor adverse events following immunization (AEFI) associated with CoronaVac, an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, in Brazilian adult (18-59 years) and elderly (≥60 years) populations.MethodsParticipants (n=538; 487 adults and 51 elderly) were enrolled from three public health services in São Paulo, Brazil. A two-dose vaccination regimen, administered 14 days apart, was used. The study assessed Adverse Reactions (AR) necessitating medical attention within seven days post-vaccination dose and monitored AEFI for a period of 42 days. Safety was monitored through a review of participant diary cards, telephone contacts, and on-site study visits.ResultsAmong adults, the most frequently reported local AR after the first and second dose was pain (256[52.6%] and 129 [29.5], respectively), while the most common systemic reaction was a headache (158[34.5%] and 51 [11.6%], respectively). Most local and systemic solicited ARs were of Grade 1 or 2, with these reactions being more prevalent in adults after the first dose. One serious adverse event possibly related to the vaccine was reported among adults, but there were no fatalities. Nine adult participants experienced adverse events of special interest, which included five cases of Covid-19.ConclusionCoronaVac demonstrated safety and tolerability in the observed population. Ongoing post-marketing surveillance is crucial for the identification of rare adverse events and further affirmation of the vaccine’s safety profile.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference24 articles.
1. Global safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines: how pharmacovigilance rose to the challenge
2. Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of treating Healthcare Professionals with the Adsorbed COVID-19 (Inactivated) Vaccine Manufactured by Sinovac – PROFISCOV: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
3. MedRA dictionary International Conference on Harmonization. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities. https://www.meddra.org/.
4. WHO/UMC/ The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardised case causality assessment [Internet]. Uppsala: The Uppsala Monitoring Centre. http://www.who-umc.org/Graphics/24734.pdf.
5. ICH Clinical Safety Data management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting [Internet]. Genebra: International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements or Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 2003. E2A. Accessed on 12 February 2019. https://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E2D/Step4/E2D_Guideline.pdf.