Critical assessment of variant prioritization methods for rare disease diagnosis within the Rare Genomes Project

Author:

Stenton Sarah L.ORCID,O’Leary Melanie,Lemire GabrielleORCID,VanNoy Grace E.ORCID,DiTroia StephanieORCID,Ganesh Vijay S.,Groopman EmilyORCID,O’Heir EmilyORCID,Mangilog Brian,Osei-Owusu Ikeoluwa,Pais Lynn S.ORCID,Serrano JillianORCID,Singer-Berk MorielORCID,Weisburd BenORCID,Wilson Michael,Austin-Tse Christina,Abdelhakim MarwaORCID,Althagafi AzzaORCID,Babbi GiuliaORCID,Bellazzi RiccardoORCID,Bovo SamueleORCID,Carta Maria Giulia,Casadio RitaORCID,Coenen Pieter-Jan,De Paoli FedericaORCID,Floris MatteoORCID,Gajapathy ManavalanORCID,Hoehndorf RobertORCID,Jacobsen Julius O.B.ORCID,Joseph Thomas,Kamandula Akash,Katsonis PanagiotisORCID,Kint Cyrielle,Lichtarge OlivierORCID,Limongelli IvanORCID,Lu YulanORCID,Magni PaoloORCID,Mamidi Tarun Karthik KumarORCID,Martelli Pier LuigiORCID,Mulargia Marta,Nicora GiovannaORCID,Nykamp Keith,Pejaver Vikas,Peng Yisu,Pham Thi Hong Cam,Podda Maurizio S.,Rao Aditya,Rizzo EttoreORCID,Saipradeep Vangala G,Savojardo CastrenseORCID,Schols Peter,Shen YangORCID,Sivadasan Naveen,Smedley DamianORCID,Soru Dorian,Srinivasan Rajgopal,Sun YuanfeiORCID,Sunderam Uma,Tan Wuwei,Tiwari Naina,Wang XiaoORCID,Wang YaqiongORCID,Williams Amanda,Worthey Elizabeth A.ORCID,Yin Rujie,You Yuning,Zeiberg DanielORCID,Zucca SusannaORCID,Bakolitsa ConstantinaORCID,Brenner Steven E.ORCID,Fullerton Stephanie MORCID,Radivojac PredragORCID,Rehm Heidi L.ORCID,O’Donnell-Luria AnneORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundA major obstacle faced by rare disease families is obtaining a genetic diagnosis. The average “diagnostic odyssey” lasts over five years, and causal variants are identified in under 50%. The Rare Genomes Project (RGP) is a direct-to-participant research study on the utility of genome sequencing (GS) for diagnosis and gene discovery. Families are consented for sharing of sequence and phenotype data with researchers, allowing development of a Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) community challenge, placing variant prioritization models head-to-head in a real-life clinical diagnostic setting.MethodsPredictors were provided a dataset of phenotype terms and variant calls from GS of 175 RGP individuals (65 families), including 35 solved training set families, with causal variants specified, and 30 test set families (14 solved, 16 unsolved). The challenge tasked teams with identifying the causal variants in as many test set families as possible. Ranked variant predictions were submitted with estimated probability of causal relationship (EPCR) values. Model performance was determined by two metrics, a weighted score based on rank position of true positive causal variants and maximum F-measure, based on precision and recall of causal variants across EPCR thresholds.ResultsSixteen teams submitted predictions from 52 models, some with manual review incorporated. Top performing teams recalled the causal variants in up to 13 of 14 solved families by prioritizing high quality variant calls that were rare, predicted deleterious, segregating correctly, and consistent with reported phenotype. In unsolved families, newly discovered diagnostic variants were returned to two families following confirmatory RNA sequencing, and two prioritized novel disease gene candidates were entered into Matchmaker Exchange. In one example, RNA sequencing demonstrated aberrant splicing due to a deep intronic indel inASNS, identified intranswith a frameshift variant, in an unsolved proband with phenotype overlap with asparagine synthetase deficiency.ConclusionsBy objective assessment of variant predictions, we provide insights into current state-of-the-art algorithms and platforms for genome sequencing analysis for rare disease diagnosis and explore areas for future optimization. Identification of diagnostic variants in unsolved families promotes synergy between researchers with clinical and computational expertise as a means of advancing the field of clinical genome interpretation.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3