Increased tolerance to commonly used antibiotics in aPseudomonas aeruginosa ex vivoporcine keratitis model

Author:

Okurowska K.ORCID,Monk P. N.ORCID,Karunakaran E.

Abstract

AbstractAntibiotics in development are usually tested on rapidly dividing cells in a culture medium and do not reflect the complexity of infectionsin vivo, while testingin vivois limited, expensive and ethically concerning. This often results in the development and subsequent prescription of antibiotics only targeting infections in which pathogens are undergoing rapid cell division and in case of persistent infections like keratitis leads to poor clinical outcomes such as impaired vision or loss of an eye. In this study, we demonstrate antibiotic tolerance ofPseudomonas aeruginosastrains PA01 and PA14 using theex vivoporcine keratitis model in which bacterial physiology more closely mimics infectionsin vivothan in a culture medium.MBEC and MIC were used as a guideline to establish the concentration of applied antibiotics on tissue. Infectedex vivoporcine corneas were treated with therapeutically relevant concentrations of gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol. Ciprofloxacin was the most potent across all tests demonstrating a positive correlation with MIC but not MBEC. Nonetheless, the results demonstrated that MIC and MBEC concentrations were not sufficient to clear infection even after 18 hours of continuous exposure to the tested antibiotics reflecting the need for novel antibiotics that can target the persistent subpopulation of these pathogens and the ability of theex vivokeratitis model to be a relevant platform to identify novel antibiotics with suitable activities. There was a clear visual distinction between corneas infected with cytotoxic strain PA14 and invasive strain PA01. In this study, both strains PA14 and PA01 showed a high level of antibiotic tolerance, which suggests that in clinical settings the treatment approach could be similar regardless of the causative strain.Data summaryThe authors confirm all supporting data and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3