Association between Parkinson’s Disease subtypes and tests of physical function: the 360-degree turn test is most predictive

Author:

Prime Morgane,McKay J. LucasORCID,Bay Allison,Hart Ariel,Kim Chaejin,Abraham Amit,Hackney Madeleine E.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBACKGROUND AND PURPOSEPeople with Parkinson’s disease (PD) present phenotypes that can be characterized as tremor-dominant (TD) or postural instability / gait difficulty (PIGD) subtypes. Differentiation of subtypes allows clinicians to predict the disease course and adjust treatment accordingly. We examined whether brief mobility and balance measures can discriminate PIGD from TD phenotypes.METHODSWe performed a cross-sectional study with individuals with PD (N=104). Blinded raters assessed participants with the UPDRS or MDS-UPDRS, and potential predictor variables: 360-degree turn test, one-leg stance, backward perturbation test and tandem walk. Participant were classified as PIGD or TD based on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale or the Movement Disorder Society revision (UPDRS or MDS-UPDRS) assessment results. Differences in study variables between subtype groups were assessed with univariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to investigate the ability of candidate predictor variables to differentiate PD subtypes.RESULTSMean age and disease duration were 68±9 and 7±5 years, respectively, and Hoehn & Yahr Stages I-IV median (1st,3rd quartile) = II (II, III). No differences between subtypes were observed for tandem walk or reactive postural control. PIGD participants performed worse on number of steps (p<0.001) and time to complete (p=0.003) the 360-degree turn test and one-leg stance (p=0.006). ROC curves showed only the 360-degree turn test could discriminate PIGD from TD with high sensitivity.CONCLUSIONSThe 360-degree turn test requires minimal time to administer and may be useful in mild-moderate PD for distinguishing PIGD from TD subtypes.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3