The Out of East Asia model versus the African Eve model of modern human origins in light of ancient mtDNA findings

Abstract

AbstractThe first molecular model of modern human origins published in 1983 had the mtDNA phylogenetic tree rooted in Asia. This model was subsequently overlooked and superseded by the African Eve model in 1987 that was premised on the unrealistic infinite site assumption and the now failed molecular clock hypothesis. We have recently developed a new framework of molecular evolution, the maximum genetic diversity (MGD) hypothesis, which has in turn led us to discover a new model of modern human origins with the roots of uniparental DNAs placed in East Asia. While the African mtDNA Eve model has haplotype N as ancestral to R, our Asia model places R as the ancestor of all. We here examined ancient mtDNAs from the literature focusing on the relationship between N and R. The data showed that all three oldest mtDNAs were R with the 45000 year old Ust-Ishim a basal type and the two ~40000 year old samples sub-branch of R. Among the numerous mtDNAs of 39500-30000 year old, most were R subtype U and only two were N samples, the 39500 year old Oase1 and the 34425 year old Salkhit. These N types are basal and hence likely close to the root of N. These ancient DNA findings suggest that basal R is ~5000 years older than basal N, thereby confirming the East Asia model and invalidating the African Eve model.