Distance from home to motor vehicle crash location: Implications for license restrictions among medically-at-risk older drivers

Author:

Joyce Nina R.,Khan Marzan A.,Zullo Andrew R.,Pfeiffer Melissa R.,Metzger Kristina B.,Margolis Seth A.,Ott Brian R.,Curry Allison E.

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground/ObjectivesThirty states allow licensing agencies to restrict the distance from home that “medically-at-risk” drivers are permitted to drive. However, there is little information on where older drivers crash relative to their home or how distance to crash varies by medical condition, and thus, what impact distance limits may have on motor vehicle crash rates for “medically-at-risk” drivers.DesignObservational study of crash-involved drivers.SettingMedicare fee-for-service claims linked to geocoded crash locations and residential addresses from police crash reports in the state of New Jersey from 2007 through 2017.ParticipantsNew Jersey Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 68 years and older involved in police-reported crashes.MeasurementsThe outcome was Euclidian distance from home to crash location. Covariates included driving-relevant medical conditions from Medicare claims, crash characteristics from police reports, and demographics from both sources.ResultsThere were 197,122 crash-involved older drivers for whom approximately 70% of crashes occurred within 5 miles and 95% within 25 miles of the driver’s residence. The mean distance to crash was 6.0 miles. Although distance from home to the crash was generally lower among drivers with (versus without) each of the medical conditions studied, the differences were small (maximum mean difference of 2.1 miles). The largest difference in distance was by licensure status, where unlicensed/suspended drivers crashed significantly farther from home than validly licensed drivers (8.8 miles, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 8.4-9.1 vs 5.9 miles, 95% CI: 5.9 – 6.0).ConclusionsFindings suggest that the majority of older adults who crash do so within a few miles from home and that the distance to crash does not differ substantially by the presence of a driving-relevant medical condition. Thus, distance restrictions may not reduce crash rates among older adults and the tradeoff between safety and mobility warrants consideration.KEYPOINTS30 states permit restriction of driving distance for medically-at-risk driversThe vast majority of crashes involving older drivers occur ≤ 25 miles of homeDistance to crash does not differ markedly across driving-relevant medical conditionsWhy does this matter?Distance restrictions are likely to impact mobility and autonomy but not crash rates

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference28 articles.

1. Ortman JE , Veklkoff JM , Hogan H. An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States. 2014. United States Census Bureau

2. Screening and Assessment of Medically At-Risk Drivers

3. Medical conditions and driver crash risk: Do license restrictions affect public safety?

4. Restricted licensing among older drivers in Iowa

5. Joyce J , Lococo KH , Gish KW , et al. Older Driver Compliance With License Restrictions. 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3