Author:
Stewart Laura S.,Alvarez-Macias Sandra,McHenry Rendie,Chappell James D.,Stratton Charles W.
Abstract
AbstractConventional susceptibility testing ofChlamydophila pneumoniaedoes not account for the complex life cycle that takes place in an obligatory intracellular niche and involves multiple morphological forms. Some of these forms (elementary bodies and cryptic bodies) cause persistence and are not susceptible to antimicrobial agents. Therefore, we describe a pilot study for alternative methods of susceptibility testing ofC. pneumoniae. These methods include delaying the addition of antimicrobial agents to cell cultures for 48 hours to allow the development of an established chlamydial infection as well as the use of reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR [RT-qPCR] to measure messenger RNA. Using these methods, susceptibility testing of an established infection in Hep2 cells was compared with conventional susceptibility testing ofC. pneumoniae.Conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing ofC. pneumoniaeresults in MICs and MBCs that would suggest that recommended treatment regimens of 2 to 3 weeks of antibiotics such as doxycycline, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and rifabutin would be sufficient. However, susceptibility testing using an established chlamydial infection in HEp2 cells reveals that none of these agents are as inhibitory and/or bactericidal as indicated by conventional methods. The resultsof this pilot study suggest that further evaluation of chlamydial susceptibility testing methods using established infection in cell cultures and RT-qPCR to measure messenger RNA are needed to optimize treatment recommendations for chronicC. pneumoniaeinfections.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory