Feasibility of controlling 2019-nCoV outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts

Author:

Hellewell JoelORCID,Abbott SamORCID,Gimma Amy,Bosse Nikos I,Jarvis Christopher IORCID,Russell Timothy W,Munday James DORCID,Kucharski Adam JORCID,Edmunds W John,Funk SebastianORCID,Eggo Rosalind MORCID,

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTo assess the viability of isolation and contact tracing to control onwards transmission from imported cases of 2019-nCoV.MethodsWe developed a stochastic transmission model, parameterised to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. We used the model to quantify the potential effectiveness of contact tracing and isolation of cases at controlling a 2019 nCoV-like pathogen. We considered scenarios that varied in: the number of initial cases; the basic reproduction number R0; the delay from symptom onset to isolation; the probability contacts were traced; the proportion of transmission that occurred before symptom onset, and the proportion of subclinical infections. We assumed isolation prevented all further transmission in the model. Outbreaks were deemed controlled if transmission ended within 12 weeks or before 5000 cases in total. We measured the success of controlling outbreaks using isolation and contact tracing, and quantified the weekly maximum number of cases traced to measure feasibility of public health effort.FindingsWhile simulated outbreaks starting with only 5 initial cases, R0 of 1.5 and little transmission before symptom onset could be controlled even with low contact tracing probability, the prospects of controlling an outbreak dramatically dropped with the number of initial cases, with higher R0, and with more transmission before symptom onset. Across different initial numbers of cases, the majority of scenarios with an R0 of 1.5 were controllable with under 50% of contacts successfully traced. For R0 of 2.5 and 3.5, more than 70% and 90% of contacts respectively had to be traced to control the majority of outbreaks. The delay between symptom onset and isolation played the largest role in determining whether an outbreak was controllable for lower values of R0. For higher values of R0 and a large initial number of cases, contact tracing and isolation was only potentially feasible when less than 1% of transmission occurred before symptom onset.InterpretationWe found that in most scenarios contact tracing and case isolation alone is unlikely to control a new outbreak of 2019-nCov within three months. The probability of control decreases with longer delays from symptom onset to isolation, fewer cases ascertained by contact tracing, and increasing transmission before symptoms. This model can be modified to reflect updated transmission characteristics and more specific definitions of outbreak control to assess the potential success of local response efforts.FundingWellcome Trust, Global Challenges Research Fund, and HDR UK.Research in ContextEvidence before this studyContact tracing and isolation of cases is a commonly used intervention for controlling infectious disease outbreaks. This intervention can be effective, but may require intensive public health effort and cooperation to effectively reach and monitor all contacts. When the pathogen has infectiousness before symptom onset, control of outbreaks using contact tracing and isolation is more challenging.Added value of this studyThis study uses a mathematical model to assess the feasibility of contact tracing and case isolation to control outbreaks of 2019-nCov, a newly emerged pathogen. We used disease transmission characteristics specific to the pathogen and therefore give the best available evidence if contact tracing and isolation can achieve control of outbreaks.Implications of all the available evidenceContact tracing and isolation may not contain outbreaks of 2019-nCoV unless very high levels of contact tracing are achieved. Even in this case, if there is asymptomatic transmission, or a high fraction of transmission before onset of symptoms, this strategy may not achieve control within three months.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference33 articles.

1. WHO. Novel Coronavirus(2019-nCoV) Situation Report 16 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200205-sitrep-16-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=23af287f_2

2. World Health Organization. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report 2. 2020.

3. European CDC . Public health management of persons having had contact with novel coronavirus cases in the European Union [Internet]. ECDC; 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/public-health-management-persons-having-had-contact-novel-coronavirus-cases

4. Quilty B , Clifford S , CCMID nCoV working group, Flasche S , Eggo RM . Effectiveness of airport screening at detecting travellers infected with 2019-nCoV. 2020 Jan 30 [cited 2020 Feb 5]; Available from: https://cmmid.github.io/ncov/airport_screening_report/airport_screening_preprint_2020_01_30.pdf

5. Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable

Cited by 115 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Waging Peace;Wreckonomics;2023-12-01

2. How to End the War on Everything (In Four Complex Steps);Wreckonomics;2023-12-01

3. Wreckonomics Goes Viral?;Wreckonomics;2023-12-01

4. The Hall of Mirrors;Wreckonomics;2023-12-01

5. Warriors on Drugs;Wreckonomics;2023-12-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3