Efficacy and Acceptability Comparisons of Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Drugs, and Their Combination for Panic Disorder in Adults: a Network Meta-analysis

Author:

Gao Fengjie,He Hairong,Yan Bin,Yang Jian,Fan Yajuan,Zhao Binbin,He Xiaoyan,Ma Qingyan,Li Baijia,Gao Yuan,Qian Li,Yang Zai,Chen Ce,Chen Yunchun,Gao Chengge,Zhu Feng,Wang Wei,Ma Xiancang

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare 22 oral drugs, cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), and their combination treatments for the acute treatment of adults with panic disorder in terms of remission rate and acceptability.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysisData sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases from their inception up to May 26, 2019.Study selectionRandomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of any oral drugs, CBT, CBT combined with any drug, or placebo in the acute treatment of adults with panic disorder diagnosed according to standard operationalized criteria. The primary outcomes were efficacy (remission rate) and acceptability (treatment discontinuations due to any cause).ResultsWe identified 6585 reports that included 68 full-text RCTs involving 11101 patients. In terms of efficacy, 13 (68%) of 19 interventions were associated with higher remission rates than those of for placebo, with ORs ranging from 2.1 (95% credible interval [CrI] = 1.1 to 4.0) for sertraline to 13 (CrI = 4.5 to 44) for CBT combined with any drug. Regarding acceptability, alprazolam, imipramine, and etizolam were associated with lower dropout rates, with ORs ranging from 0.23 (CrI = 0.15 to 0.33) for alprazolam to 0.076 (CrI = 0.0021 to 0.77) for etizolam. Most of the differences between the other interventions were unclear. In head-to-head analyses, CBT combined with any drug was more effective than the other interventions, but it was no associated with an improvement in acceptability (OR = 0.12 to 0.219).ConclusionsCBT combined with any drug was more effective than the other interventions analyzed in this study. CBT alone did not differ significantly from other drugs alone. We found that most drugs are effective against panic disorder, but they exhibit different acceptability and tolerability profiles.What is already known on this topicSome randomized controlled trials indicated that combined therapy are more effective than drug alone or cognitive behavior therapy alone. Nevertheless, drug monotherapy, cognitive behavior therapy, and combination therapy had never been compared in a comprehensive network meta-analysis. With this evidence gap remaining, the availability of reliable evidence of the relative merits of multiple interventions is essential to ensuring that clinicians choose the best option for each individual patient.What this study addsThis network meta-analysis is the first to evaluate the relative merits of cognitive behavior therapy, cognitive behavior therapy combined with any drug, and 22 oral drugs in the field of panic disorder. The results showed a significant higher remission rates for cognitive behavior therapy combined with any drug than those of the other interventions. Cognitive behavior therapy alone was superior to placebo but did not differ significantly from other active drugs. Additionally, paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, sertraline, and clonazepam are more recommendable than the other drugs based on their remission rates, scores on panic-symptoms scales, and acceptability.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3