A new content-qualified antenatal care coverage indicator: development and validation of a score using national health surveys

Author:

Arroyave LuisaORCID,Saad Ghada EORCID,Victora Cesar GORCID,Barros Aluisio J DORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionGood quality antenatal care (ANC) helps reduce maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Most studies that attempted to measure ANC quality proposed categorical indicators considering either contact with services or based on content, sometimes both. We aimed to create and validate a new indicator measured as a score, considering both contact and content.MethodsWe used Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. Information on ANC contact and content was used to build an adequacy score that would be applicable to all women in need of ANC. Cronbach’s alpha and factor analysis were used to assess the proposed indicator. We also used a convergent validation approach, exploring the association with neonatal mortality.ResultsThe proposed indicator (ANCq) is derived from the number of visits, timing of the first visit, skill level of the attendant, blood pressure measurement, tetanus toxoid vaccination and collection of blood and urine samples. The validity assessment showed satisfactory results with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient equal to 0.82. ANCq score ranges from 0 to 10. The overall mean of ANCq in 63 LMICs with data was 6.7, ranging from 3.5 in Afghanistan to 9.3 in Cuba and the Dominican Republic. In most countries, higher scores of ANCq were associated with lower neonatal mortality, with pooled odds ratio of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.92).ConclusionANCq allows the assessment of ANC in LMICs considering contact with services and content of care. ANCq presented good validity properties, being a useful tool for assessing ANC coverage and adequacy of care in monitoring and accountability exercises.Key questionsWhat is already known?Antenatal care (ANC) is an important part of primary healthcare, being associated with reductions in maternal and new-born morbidity and mortality, mainly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).Several indicators have been proposed to measured ANC quality either through contacts with services or based on content of care, or sometimes both. Several of the proposed indicators are applicable only to women who had at least one ANC visit, and measured quality as a categorical indicator.Consensus on the need for a more comprehensive ANC indicator that is suitable for monitoring progress, including aspects of quality of care.What are the new findings?We proposed a content-qualified ANC indicator in the form of a score, called ANCq. It includes seven different variables related to contact with services and content of care received during pregnancy. The indicator is applicable to all pregnant women.The indicator has good validity properties and was inversely associated with neonatal mortality.There is wide variation across countries regarding the average ANCq score, and large within-country variation at individual level. Latin America and the Caribbean and East Asia and the Pacific are the best performing regions.What do the new findings imply?The proposed indicator provides a standardized and comparable measure of ANC adequacy, allowing for comparisons between and within countries.The indicator can help monitoring ANC progress to all women in need of ANC, with several advantages over currently existing indicators: it is applicable to all pregnant women independent of having accessed ANC services, it includes serval aspects of ANC content and, being a score, provides a gradation of how suitable ANC was.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference34 articles.

1. World Health Organization. WHO | Essential interventions, commodities and guidelines for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2019 May 29]. Available from: https://www.who.int/pmnch/media/press/2011/20111215_essential_interventions_pr/en/

2. Improving quality of antenatal care through provision of medical supply kits;Lancet Glob Health,2018

3. Tetui M , Ekirapa EK , Bua J , Mutebi A , Tweheyo R , Waiswa P. Quality of Antenatal care services in eastern Uganda: implications for interventions. Pan Afr Med J [Internet]. 2012 09 [cited 2019 Jan 14];13. Available from: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/13/27/full/

4. Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India

5. Fagbamigbe AF , Idemudia ES . Assessment of quality of antenatal care services in Nigeria: evidence from a population-based survey. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2015 Sep 18 [cited 2017 Aug 28];12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574449/

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3