A Scoping Review of Mathematical Models Covering Alzheimer’s Disease Progression

Author:

Moravveji Seyedadel,Doyon Nicolas,Mashreghi Javad,Duchesne Simon

Abstract

AbstractAlzheimer’s disease is a complex, multi-factorial and multi-parametric neurodegenerative etiology. Mathematical models can help understand such a complex problem by providing a way to explore and conceptualize principles, merging biological knowledge with experimental data into a model amenable to simulation and external validation, all without the need for extensive clinical trials.We performed a scoping review of mathematical models of AD with a search strategy applied to the PubMed database which yielded 846 entries. After applying our exclusion criteria, only 17 studies remained from which we extracted data, focusing on three aspects of mathematical modeling: how authors addressed continuous time, how models were solved, and how the high dimensionality and non-linearity of models were managed. Most articles modeled AD at the cellular range of the disease process, operating on a short time scale (e.g., minutes; hours), i.e., the micro view (12/17); the rest considered regional or brain-level processes, with longer timescales (e.g., years, decades) (the macro view). Most papers were concerned primarily with(n= 8), few modeled with bothand tau proteins (n= 3), and some considered more than these two factors in the model (n= 6). Models used partial differential equations (PDEs;n= 3), ordinary differential equations (ODEs;n= 7), both PDEs and ODEs (n= 3). Some didn’t specify the mathematical formalism (n= 4). Sensitivity analyses were performed in only a small number of papers (4/17).Overall, we found that only two studies could be considered valid in terms of parameters and conclusions, and two more were partially valid. The majority (n= 13) either was invalid or there was insufficient information to ascertain their status. While mathematical models are powerful and useful tools for the study of AD, closer attention to reporting is necessary to gauge the quality of published studies to replicate or continue with their contributions.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference30 articles.

1. 2022 Navigating the path forward for dementia in Canada. Alzheimer Society of Canada, LANDMARK Study/Path/2022.

2. 2019 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

3. Internal, External, and Ecological Validity in Research Design, Conduct, and Evaluation;Indian J Psychol Med,2018

4. Nonidentifiability in Model Calibration and Implications for Medical Decision Making

5. Data-driven modeling of Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis;Journal of Theoretical Biology,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3