Determinants for detection of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants of concern in health care workers by rapid antigen tests

Author:

Wettengel Jochen M.,Strehle Katharina,von Lucke Catharina,Roggendorf Hedwig,Jeske Samuel D.,Christa Catharina,Zelger Otto,Haller Bernhard,Protzer UlrikeORCID,Knolle Percy A.

Abstract

IMPORTANCEThe rapid genetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and in particular the highly contagious Omicron variant of concern (VoC) may pose problems for rapid and accurate diagnosis of infection.OBJECTIVEDetermine the diagnostic accuracy and robustness of a second generation rapid antigen tests compared to gold-standard, PCR-based diagnostics, for detection of infection with different SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VoC sub lineages in health care workers.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe study included 428 health care workers from the University Hospital Munich Rechts der Isar of the Technical University of Munich who either reported recent onset of COVID-19 associated symptoms or completed routine diagnostic testing between 24thof May and 22ndof September 2022. All participants gave written informed consent to participate in this study and completed a questionnaire on infection-associated symptoms, prior SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccination status.INTERVENTIONSDuring the first visit, two nasal swabs and one oropharyngeal swab were taken to perform two rapid antigen tests and a SARS-CoV-2 PCR-assay, respectively. A second set of nasal swabs was taken by the participants themselves two days later to repeat the two rapid antigen tests.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe accuracy for detection of infection with different SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VoCs with two rapid antigen tests (Test IandTest II) was determined and compared to quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels detected by PCR.RESULTSIn a side-by-side comparison, we found thatTest Idetected viral nucleocapsids from Omicron VoC (BA.5.2.3) at higher dilutions compared toTest II. In the 428 health care workers,Test Iand Test II detected PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with different Omicron VoCs (BA.2, BA.4, BA.5) with a sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI 81.9% - 94.6%) and 83.7% (95% CI 75.12% - 90.18%), respectively. Increased sensitivity ofTest Iwas also reflected by earlier detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The lower test sensitivity ofTest IIcould be compensated for by a repeated test performed two days later.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEOur study demonstrates that rapid antigen tests are suited to detect infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VoC and reveal an advantage of a lower detection limit for earlier detection of infection in health care workers.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3